Holding Business Interests in Trusts - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit


Original Program Date:
May 18, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


There are tax and other benefits to holding a closely-held company or other business interests in a trust. But there are also substantial risks. Trusts are typically required to diversify their holdings. But when a company is held in a trust there is almost a highly concentrated, and thus risky, position. Similarly, holding real estate or nontraditional assets also involves issues of liquidity and proper fiduciary and income tax administration. This program will provide you with a real world guide placing business interests in a trust.

  • Dilemmas of operating companies in trusts – concentrated assets, speed, decision-making
  • Concentrated assets and the fiduciary duty to diversify
  • Counseling clients about the right trust for different asset classes
  • Preserving S Corp status or other tax benefits in trust
  • Business succession planning for family businesses
  • Managing minority stakes in operating companies or assets
  • Financial and tax administration traps


Speakers:

Michael Sneeringer a partner in the Naples, Florida office of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, where his practice focuses on trust and estate planning, probate administration, asset protection planning, and tax law. He has served as vice chair of the asset protection planning committee of the ABA’s Real Property, Trust and Estate Section and is an official reporter of the Heckerling Institute. Mr. Sneeringer received his B.A. from Washington & Jefferson College, his J.D., cum laude, St. Thomas University School of Law, and his LL.M. from the University of Miami School of Law.

Missia H. Vaselaney is a partner in the Cleveland office of Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, where her practice focuses on estate planning for individuals and businesses. She also represents clients before federal and state taxing authorities. Ms. Vaselaney is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and has been a member of the Steering Committee for AICPA’s National Advanced Estate Planning Conference since 2001. Ms. Vaselaney received her B.A. from the University of Dayton and her J.D. from the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law.


Text Messages & Litigation: Discovery and Evidentiary Issues - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


0.75 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: May 12, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Text messaging is mainstream. Clients generate virtual reams of data when they message with business partners, vendors, employees, and even public. This is a rich vein of electronically stored information that is potentially discoverable in formal litigation or pre-litigation. Because texting is so convenient, casual and almost reflexive, the caution clients exercise in other forms of communication are often disregarded when texting, including when they text with their lawyers. This program will provide you with a practical guide to obtaining text messages, the risks of discovery in litigation, and related issues.

  • Obtaining text messages – working with mobile carriers
  • Timing – how long are texts kept and in what form?
  • Discovery issues – obtaining texts from parties or other sources
  • Issues related to encrypted messaging services
  • How strategies differ for plaintiffs and defendants


Speaker:

Stanley E. Woodward Jr. is a partner in the law firm Brand Woodward Law, where he has a broad civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense practice. He also conducts internal corporate investigations. He serves as an adjunct professor of law at Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law, where he teaches pre-trial litigation and employment law. Before entering private practice, he served as a judicial clerk to Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and Judges Joan Zeldon and Judge Rufus King III of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Mr. Woodward earned his B.A., cum laude, and his M.S., magna cum laude, from American University, and his J.D., cum laude, from The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law.

Closely Held Company Merger & Acquisitions, Part 2 - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: May 11, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Mergers and buyouts of closely held companies are complex, multifaceted processes. Agreeing on a valuation can be very difficult because there is no regular market of buyers and sellers and information on comparable sales is scarce. Closely held companies are typically structured to benefit a few shareholders, often members of a family, and require their financial statements to be normalized. There can also be substantial issues of liability, including successor liability in asset deals, requiring carefully crafted reps and warranties. Confidentiality is often essential in these transactions as sellers try not to unsettle existing commercial relationships and employees. This program will provide you with a practical guide to major planning and drafting considerations in the mergers and buyouts of closely held companies.


Day 2 – May 11, 2022:
  • Reps, warranties, indemnity and basket issues common to closely held companies
  • Successor liability concerns where assets are transferred
  • Asset transfer issues – intangible assets, including intellectual property
  • Transition issues – management, employees, business relationship, contract issues
  • Escrow and post-closing issues


Speaker:

Daniel G. Straga is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where he counsels companies on a wide variety of corporate and business matters across a range of industries. He advises clients on mergers and acquisitions, capital raising, venture capital, and governance matters. He also have extensive experience in private equity and cross-border transactions. Mr. Straga earned his and his B.A. from the University of Delaware and his J.D. from the George Washington University Law School.

Molly Merritts is an attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where she focuses her practice on a wide range of corporate law matters, including mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, and real estate investment trusts. She also advises clients on corporate governance matters, transactional and commercial contract negotiations, and corporate reorganizations. Ms. Merritt earned her B.S. from the University of Maryland, and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.

Closely Held Company Merger & Acquisitions, Part 1 - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit


Original Program Date:
May 10, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Mergers and buyouts of closely held companies are complex, multifaceted processes. Agreeing on a valuation can be very difficult because there is no regular market of buyers and sellers and information on comparable sales is scarce. Closely held companies are typically structured to benefit a few shareholders, often members of a family, and require their financial statements to be normalized. There can also be substantial issues of liability, including successor liability in asset deals, requiring carefully crafted reps and warranties. Confidentiality is often essential in these transactions as sellers try not to unsettle existing commercial relationships and employees. This program will provide you with a practical guide to major planning and drafting considerations in the mergers and buyouts of closely held companies.

Day 1 – May 10, 2022:

  • Confidentiality considerations in the sale and negotiation process
  • Due diligence – financial, operational and workforce red flags
  • Stock v. asset transactions and forms of consideration – cash v. equity
  • Valuation of closely held companies in an illiquid market
  • Use or of “earnouts” to bridge the gap in valuation

Speaker:

Daniel G. Straga is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where he counsels companies on a wide variety of corporate and business matters across a range of industries. He advises clients on mergers and acquisitions, capital raising, venture capital, and governance matters. He also have extensive experience in private equity and cross-border transactions. Mr. Straga earned his and his B.A. from the University of Delaware and his J.D. from the George Washington University Law School.

Molly Merritts is an attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where she focuses her practice on a wide range of corporate law matters, including mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, and real estate investment trusts. She also advises clients on corporate governance matters, transactional and commercial contract negotiations, and corporate reorganizations. Ms. Merritt earned her B.S. from the University of Maryland, and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.

Defending Estate and Gift Tax Audits - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: May 5, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


The IRS reviews every estate and gift tax return and audits them at a far higher rates than income tax returns. When a client return is chosen for examination and audit, an estate is subject to a very time-consuming and costly process. Understanding the steps in the process, the personnel involved, and the limits of what you can reasonably expect as part of a settlement are all essential to successfully concluding an audit. It’s also very important to understand how returns are selected for exam. This program will provide you with a practical guide preparing for and defending and audit and tips for reducing the risk of triggering an audit.

  • Timeline, process, personnel and deadlines – understanding how an audit unfolds
  • Common audit triggers and how returns are selected for examination
  • Review of common issues on audit – FLP/FLLCs, defined value clauses, insurance policies and lifetime gifts
  • Drafting responses and working with IRS personnel
  • Determining the range of reasonable settlement proposals
  • Important attorney-client privilege, statute of limitation, and evidentiary considerations


Speakers:

Brian R. Harris is a partner in the Tampa, Florida office of Fogarty Mueller Harris, PLLC, where he represents clients in federal, state, and local tax controversy and litigation throughout the United States. He also represents clients before the IRS, state departments of revenue, and municipalities. Earlier in his career, he was a trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, and lead attorney for the United States and IRS in federal courts across the country. Mr. Harris received his B.S. and M.S. from the University of Florida and his J.D. from the University of Florida College of Law.

Trust and Estate Planning for Illiquid Assets - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


0.75 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: June 28, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Liquidity is an almost universal need in trust and estate planning. When a client dies, death taxes may need to be paid. Expenses incurred in administration need to be paid. Distributions may be required under trust instruments. For these and many other reasons, estates need cash. The big challenge comes when the estate has assets that, though valuable, are not liquid. Assets may include real estate that is not quickly or cost-effectively sold. Or a successful family business may be involved, where ownership stakes are not easily transferred or for which there is no ready market. Complex financial assets, artwork or other unique property, hard to value and hard to sell, may also be held. Trust and estate plans must anticipate the need for liquidity and formulate strategies for providing it or deferring taxes and distributions until liquidity can be created. This program will provide you with a real world guide to practical strategies for creating liquidity in trust and estate planning.

  • Challenges of planning for illiquid assets like real estate, family businesses, and unique property
  • Techniques and tools to fund tax liabilities, distributions, expenses and more
  • Mechanics of electing a deferral of estate tax under IRC Section 6166
  • Use and advantages of using Graegin notes to obtain liquidity
  • Advantages and disadvantages of use of redemptions and buy-sell agreements
  • Use of life insurance and other financial products to provide liquidity


Speakers:


Jonathan Gopman is a partner with Akerman, LLP in Naples and chair of the firm’s trusts and estate practice group. His practice focuses on sophisticated wealth accumulation and preservation planning strategies for entrepreneurs. He also assists entrepreneurs with their personal and business planning needs at all phases of the wealth accumulation and preservation cycle. Mr. Gopman is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel and co-author of the revised version of the BNA Tax Management Portfolio on Estate Tax Payments and Liabilities.

Drafting Stockholder Agreements, Part 2 - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: June 15, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Stockholders’ agreements can make or break a closely held company. Voting control is allocated, distribution policies established, buy-sell mechanisms defined, and the relationship of the owners organized. Most of the big decisions of a closely held company are made in the stockholders’ agreement. In the context of S Corporations, these agreements take on even more importance in the form of various restrictions to ensure the corporation does not lose its pass-through status for federal income tax purposes. This program will provide you with a guide to planning and drafting the most essential provisions of stockholders’ agreements for C and S corporations.


Day 2 – June 15, 2022:
  • Restrictions on transferability and mechanisms to buy/sell restricted stock
  • Valuation methodologies for stock that does not have a liquid market
  • Protective provisions for S Corps – preventing transfers to ineligible holders
  • Provisions for approving the termination an S Corp election
  • Close corporations and the ability to govern the company without a board of directors


Speaker:

Frank Ciatto is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where he has 20 years’ experience advising clients on mergers and acquisitions, limited liability companies, tax and accounting issues, and corporate finance transactions. He is a leader of his firm’s private equity and hedge fund groups and a member of the Mergers & Acquisitions Subcommittee of the ABA Business Law Section. He is a Certified Public Accountant and earlier in his career worked at what is now PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York. Mr. Ciatto earned his B.A., cum laude, at Georgetown University and his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center.

Molly Merritts is an attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where she focuses her practice on a wide range of corporate law matters, including mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, and real estate investment trusts. She also advises clients on corporate governance matters, transactional and commercial contract negotiations, and corporate reorganizations. Ms. Merritt earned her B.S. from the University of Maryland, and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.

Drafting Stockholder Agreements, Part 1 - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


0.75 hour MCLE credit


Original Program Date: June 14, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Stockholders’ agreements can make or break a closely held company. Voting control is allocated, distribution policies established, buy-sell mechanisms defined, and the relationship of the owners organized. Most of the big decisions of a closely held company are made in the stockholders’ agreement. In the context of S Corporations, these agreements take on even more importance in the form of various restrictions to ensure the corporation does not lose its pass-through status for federal income tax purposes. This program will provide you with a guide to planning and drafting the most essential provisions of stockholders’ agreements for C and S corporations.


Day 1 – June 14, 2022:

  • Practical uses of stockholders’ agreements
  • Management and voting rights – what events trigger a vote and by whom
  • Economic rights – distributions, taxes, and liquidations
  • Information rights – access to operational, financial and tax information


Speaker:

Frank Ciatto is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where he has 20 years’ experience advising clients on mergers and acquisitions, limited liability companies, tax and accounting issues, and corporate finance transactions. He is a leader of his firm’s private equity and hedge fund groups and a member of the Mergers & Acquisitions Subcommittee of the ABA Business Law Section. He is a Certified Public Accountant and earlier in his career worked at what is now PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York. Mr. Ciatto earned his B.A., cum laude, at Georgetown University and his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center.

Molly Merritts is an attorney in the Washington, D.C. office of Venable, LLP, where she focuses her practice on a wide range of corporate law matters, including mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, and real estate investment trusts. She also advises clients on corporate governance matters, transactional and commercial contract negotiations, and corporate reorganizations. Ms. Merritt earned her B.S. from the University of Maryland, and her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.

2022 Trust Litigation Update - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: June 3, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


The world is in the midst of the greatest transfer of wealth ever recorded. Baby Boomers retired with more wealth than any earlier generation and retired with more complicated family circumstances. This wealth and family complexity are giving rise to more trust litigation. This litigation includes the extent to which trust interests are reachable in divorce proceedings; fiduciary investment decisions, the handling of concentrated positions in closely held companies, and arguably tortious interference with trust interests. This program will review significant developments in fiduciary litigation.

  • Disputes over discretionary decisions, including distributions
  • Tortious interference with inheritance interests
  • Handling concentrated positions in closely held companies
  • Disputes involving operation of family businesses in trusts
  • Counseling clients when fiduciary litigation involves family animosity


Speakers:

Steven B. Malech is partner in the New York City office of Wiggin and Dana, LLP, where he is chair of the firm’s probate litigation practice group. He is represents beneficiaries, fiduciaries and creditors in disputes involving alleged violations of the Prudent Investor Act and its predecessors, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, disputed accountings, and will contests. He represents clients in cutting edge probate litigation matters involving trusts and estates with assets in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Mr. Malech received his B.A., with special honors, from the University of Texas and his J.D. from the Connecticut School of Law.

2022 Retaliation and Wrongful Discharge Update - A National Perspective

Presented by the ISBA


1.0 hour MCLE credit



Original Program Date: June 2, 2022
Accreditation Expiration Date: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­May 9, 2025 (You must certify completion and save your certificate before this date to get MCLE credit)


Retaliation claims are among the most common form of employment litigation, either as standalone claims or when a substantive claim of harassment or discrimination fails. The scope of an employee’s protected conduct – whistleblower activity, requests for accommodation, and other forms of activity – is not limitless but it expansive. There are also complicated questions of what constitutes an adverse action by an employer and the causal connection between the employee’s protected activity and the adverse action. This program will review of recent case law and other developments impacting each of the elements of an actionable retaliation claim and best practices to avoid liability.

  • Case law developments impacting elements of retaliation claims – protected conduct, adverse action, and causation
  • Scope of “protected conduct,” including requests for reasonable accommodation
  • What constitutes adverse action by the employer – and when action must be taken
  • Standards for establishing causal link between protected conduct and adverse action
  • Relationship among harassment, discrimination, ADA and retaliation claims


Speaker:

Ryan Derry is a partner in the San Francisco office of Paul Hastings, LLP. His practice includes all aspects of employment litigation and counseling, including employment discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and wage and hour claims. He represents employers in multiple jurisdictions in state and federal courts as well as in administrative proceedings against individual and class claims. He has been named as a California Super Lawyer Rising Star for multiple years. Mr. Derry received his B.S., summa cum laude, from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and his J.D. from The George Washington University Law School, with honors, in 2006.