Tax and estate planning issues for non-citizens
By Michael R. Pieczonka & David A. Berek
International and Immigration Law,
September 2012
The second installment of material culled from the May 3, 2012 CLE presentation, "What if Your Client is Foreign-Born? Good Lawyering in the Global Legal Environment."
Tax & estate planning issues for non-citizens
By Michael R. Pieczonka & David A. Berek
International and Immigration Law,
August 2012
The first installment of material culled from the May 3, 2012 CLE presentation, "What if Your Client is Foreign-Born? Good Lawyering in the Global Legal Environment."
A year-end opportunity to wash your dirty stocks: Harvesting losses with wash sales
By David A. Berek & Jesse T. Coyle
Trusts and Estates,
January 2009
The Internal Revenue Code Section 165(a) permits deductions for any loss sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise. The broad language of Section 165 seemingly allows deductions for almost any type of loss. Logically, the language has of this Section has resulted in abuse, causing Congress to respond by creating limitations on the deductibility of losses. One of the deductions that Congress has disallowed is the deduction for losses resulting from wash sales of stock or securities.
Selected developments in income, estate, gift & generation-skipping transfer tax
By David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
December 2006
Consistent with the holding in O’Neill, the Second Circuit affirmed the Tax Court in Rudkin v. United States, 124 TC No. 19 (June 27, 2005) that investment advisory fees paid by a trust are deductible only to the extent those fees exceed 2 percent of the trusts adjusted gross income.
Recent developments in federal tax
By David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
October 2005
On August 22, 2005 the Service issued eight Revenue Procedures setting forth sample trust language for charitable remainder unitrusts.
In brief: Case reviews
By Katarinna McBride & David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
August 2005
In the Estate of Jelke, the Tax Court acknowledged that its position to reduce built-in capital gains was a controversial.
Recent developments in estate, gift, and income tax
By David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
June 2005
Three recent cases, Estate of Bongard, Estate of Bigelow and In re Ehman illustrate the importance of non-tax reasons for creating family limited partnerships.
Other recent developments and cases
By David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
March 2005
The Service issued Proposed Regulations under section 2702, 69 Fed. Reg. 44476 (2004), consistent with the holdings in Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000), acq., Notice 2003-72, 2003-44 I.R.B. 964 (Nov. 3, 2003), and Schott v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2001-110, rev'd and remanded 319 F.3d 1203 (9th Cir. 2003).
Intestate transfer does not satisfy “otherwise given” for purposes of stock purchase agreement
By Christopher M. Tietz & David A. Berek
Trusts and Estates,
September 2004
In Opiela v. Roth, decided June 17, 2004, the Illinois Supreme Court held that stock of a closely held company which was subject to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”) between the company and a decedent, was not given by the decedent on his death to his descendants through intestate succession, but rather remained subject to the Agreement, and accordingly the company was entitled to purchase the shares.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author