State Officials and Employees Ethics Act-Applicability to municipalitiesBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, October 2004In late 2003, the Illinois General Assembly passed two bills representing significant ethics reform legislation. Public Act 93-615 became affective November 19, 2003.
Open Meetings Act-Right to participateBy John H. BrechinGovernment Lawyers, June 2004The City of Cocoa enacted regulations limiting the right of non-residents to speak during its city council meetings.
Contracts-Did one exist?By John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, April 2004Plaintiff D.S.A. purchases accounts receivable from other companies at a discount. In November 2000, a representative from D.P. Staffing approached D.S.A. noting that D.P. Staffing had provided services to Provident Hospital, and as a result Provident owed D.P. Staffing more than $300,000.
Open Meetings Act- Right to participateBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, April 2004The City of Cocoa enacted regulations limiting the right of non-resident to speak during its city council meetings.
A request for refund of impact fees paid is not barred by the Tort Immunity ActBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, April 2004Raintree filed an action against Long Grove, seeking a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the Village's ordinance requiring the payment of impact fees to obtain building permits. Its action also sought a refund of the fees paid by Raintree totaling more than $80,000.
Vested rights and tort immunityBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, April 2004n 1981 the Village and O'Malley entered into an annexation agreement. In 1994 the parties extended the original annexation agreement to 2001 and O'Malley submitted a development concept plan to the Village
Beyond Klaeren—The even newer world of zoningBy John H. BrechinAdministrative Law, September 2003The March 2003 edition of the Local Government Law newsletter included two articles on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court in Klaeren1 and the Second District Appellate Court in Gallik.2
Eminent domain in Illinois: 2002 developmentsBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, December 2002In this past year the Illinois courts have provided a significant number of important decisions concerning eminent domain.
Recent decisions of interestBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, May 2001Shaw Industries v. Community College District No. 515 (First District, December 12, 2000) involved a claim by Shaw that the defendant's failure to require the procurement of a payment bond from its contractor, Prairie State Associates, breached its contract.
How much is that property worth?By John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, August 2000Department of Transportation v. Bolas, decided May 23, 2000, involved an eminent domain action by IDOT to acquire approximately one acre of a 58-acre farm for a roadway improvement.
Recent decisions of interestBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, June 2000Three recent Seventh Circuit decisions have examined the issue whether the State of Illinois is immune from the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Eminent domain—public use and private benefitBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, November 1999An essential element of any valid eminent domain action is that the property be taken to benefit the public instead of private individuals.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.