District court finds actual carrier notice of cargo loss excuses late shipper claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2005In Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. Ltd., et al., v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., Case No. 03-2741 (10/8/04), U.S. District Court Judge Samuel DerYeghiayan granted the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion in Carmack Amendment 49 U.S.C. 14706 cargo loss and damage litigation and denied without prejudice defendant’s partial motion for summary judgment to limit its damages.
District Court tells trucking company to get it in writingBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, March 2005In Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, et al. v. Pneumatic Trucking, Inc., Case No. 04 C-0298, District Court Judge Harry Leinenweber of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the major part of Central States' Motion for Summary Judgment on Central States' claim that Pneumatic owed contributions to the pension fund, notwithstanding contrary oral agreements between Pneumatic and the union Locals representing its drivers.
Defendant status issue stays Carmack preemptionBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2004Judge David Coar of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has denied a Rule 12(b)6 Motion to Dismiss based on Carmack Amendment preemption under 49 U.S.C.
District court finds actual carrier notice of cargo loss excuses late shipper claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2004In Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. Ltd., et al., v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., Case No. 03-2741 (10/8/04), U.S. District Court Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan granted the plaintiffs' summary judgment motion in Carmack Amendment 49 U.S.C. 14706 cargo loss and damage litigation and denied without prejudice defendant's partial motion for summary judgment to limit its damages.
Hours of service battles continueBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2004The new Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ("FMCSA") hours of service rules for truck drivers went into effect on January 4, 2004.
Union decertification held not to trigger complete ERISA withdrawal liabilityBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2004In Central States, Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund v. Schilli Corporation, Case No. 03-8880 (11/15/04), Judge John Darrah of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Central States' assertion that an employee vote to decertify a union created a complete ERISA withdrawal liability for their employer.
District court sustains Carmack Amendment federal jurisdiction on international shipmentBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2004In Capital Converting Equipment, Inc. v. LEP Transports, Inc., F.2d 391 (7th Cir. 1992), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. §11706, provides no cargo damage remedy against rail carriers on international shipments originating at points in foreign countries and moving to U.S. destinations on through bills of lading unless some domestic part of the shipments were covered under separate bills of lading issued by domestic rail or motor carriers.
U.S. Supreme Court to review 11th Circuit COGSA Himalaya Clause decisionBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2004The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Kirby v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Case No. 01-13776, decided August 8, 2002.
10th Circuit rejects “logo liability” in cargo loss and damage litigationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2004On August 25, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit rejected the concept of logo liability in Carmack Amendment litigation in the matter of Mercer Transportation Company v. Greentree Transportation Co., et al., Case No. 01-1380.
Divided 4th District Appellate Court sustains non-solicitation clauseBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2004In a 2-1 decision, the Illinois Appellate Court for the 4th District has found that a non-solicitation clause in a broker-carrier contract is enforceable against the motor carrier on business that the motor carrier had secured on its own without any broker referral in Berryman Transfer & Storage Company, Inc. v. New Prime, Inc., Case No. 4-03-0345, decided 2/28/2004.
Illinois Appellate Court rejects carrier liability limits in cargo litigationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2004The Illinois Appellate Court for the First District has held that the cargo loss and damage liability limits published in a motor carrier's tariff were ineffective to limit the carrier's liability to a shipper in cargo loss and damage litigation unless the shipper had actual notice of the liability limitation and assented to it prior to the shipment.
Illinois Supreme Court decision assists Illinois driver leasing companiesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2004On February 20, 2004, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision which will greatly assist the Illinois driver leasing industry in H&M Commercial Driver Leasing, Inc. v. Fox Valley Containers, Inc., Docket No. 96057.
Who’s the consignee? Seventh Circuit reverses judgment against warehouseman for demurrage chargesBy William D. BrejchaRacial and Ethnic Minorities and the Law, December 2003The U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago has reversed a summary judgment in favor of the Illinois Central Railroad ("the IC) for demurrage charges against a warehouseman which provided storage in transit services in Illinois Central Railroad Company v. South Tec Development Warehouse, No. 02-2957 (July 23, 2003).
Who issued the bill of lading anyway? 11th Circuit grapples with liability limitationsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, July 2003The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has taken an interesting approach to the ongoing released rate cargo loss and damage issue in Siren, Inc. v. Estes Express, Inc., 249 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2001) and Sassy Doll Creations, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., No. 02-12210 (11th Circuit; 5/23/03).
3rd Circuit affirms damage award for late delivery of dated materialsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2003The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit has awarded a shipper the entire invoice value of Christmas-related paper goods that a motor carrier had lost and failed to deliver until the end of the following March in Paper Magic Group v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc., 2003 WL 135787 (3d Cir. 1/16/03)
District court rules for broker on cargo claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2003In Chubb Group v. H.A. Transp. Systems, Inc., Case No. VC 01-9192 AHM (MEX) (10/9/02), the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment to defendant transportation broker H.A.
Illinois Department of Insurance “opt out” ruling a clarification for Illinois motor carriersBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2003The Illinois Appellate Court for the 1st District clobbered the Illinois trucking industry in 1997 when it ruled that workers' compensation insurers could collect premiums from motor carriers based on revenues the motor carriers paid to independent contractor owner-operators who were ineligible for workers' compensation benefits under Illinois law in Wausau Insurance Co. v. Kim's Trucking, Inc., 289 Ill. App. 3d 201, 682 N.E. 2d 190 (1st Dist. 1997) appl. denied 175 Ill. 2d 555 (1997)
Cargo damage judgment affirmed as to liability, but reversed as to damagesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003The Illinois Appellate Court for the Second District has affirmed in part and reversed in part a summary judgment awarded to an insurer against a motor carrier in a subrogation suit arising out of a cargo damage claim to an electron microscope in Wausau Ins. Co. v. All Chicagoland Moving And Storage Company, Case No. 02-01-1317 (decided September 27, 2002).
Conversion claim preempted by CarmackBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003In Chen v. Mayflower Transit, Inc., 2002 Fed. Carr Cases &84,251 (7/19/02), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois confronted several state law claims which arose on a household goods move from Atlanta to Chicago.
District court applies state law to resolve stolen international shipment issueBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003In Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Hanjin Shipping Co., 2002 Fed. Car. Cases &84, 249 (Sept. 2002), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois wrestled with the complicated issues of what law to apply in a dispute about the failed delivery of a Black & Decker power tool shipment from Shenzhen, China to Lowe's Company in North Vernon, IN.
Carmack preemption bars shipper’s state claimsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, October 2002The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of state court causes of action which a couple had asserted against a motor carrier in Smith v. United Parcel Service, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13972, 2002 Fed. Car. Cos. &84,242, decided July 11, 2002.
Carmack removal proper where household goods were stolen from storageBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, October 2002The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has held that removal of a state court complaint arising out of a theft of household goods from storage after a New York to California household goods move was proper in Newens v. ORNA Services, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10685, 2002 Fed.Car.
Third circuit finds railroad to be Carmack shipperBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, October 2002The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found a railroad to be a Carmack Amendment shipper in Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Greentree Transportation Trucking Co., 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11372 and 2002 Fed. Car. Cases &84,234, p.58,182, decided May 16, 2002
District Court finds interstate drivers exempt from FLSA’s overtime provisionsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, August 2002The U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois has rejected a claim for overtime pay brought by employees of a Decatur newspaper under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in Barron v. Lee Enterprises, 2002 WL 113790 (C.D. Ill. 2002).
7th Circuit affirms withdrawal liability judgment against sole proprietor owner of withdrawing motor carrierBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2002The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed a judgment entered against a sole proprietorship found to have been a commonly controlled trade or business with a motor carrier employer assessed with ERISA withdrawal liability in Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Neiman, Case Nos. 01-1964 and 01-2379 (7th Cir., April 2, 2002).
U.S. imposes new safety rules for motor carriersBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2002The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) has proposed an interim final rule to establish new minimum requirements for American and Canadian applicants for new motor carrier operating authority.
6th Circuit allows DOT to require organized motor carrier recordsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2002The United States Court of Appeals backed the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's ("FMCSA") insistence that motor carriers produce organized records to its auditors in A.D. Transport Express v. United States, 202 WL 104797 (6th Cir. 2002).
7th circuit finds federal law bars pension fund trustee from collecting owner operator ERISA contributionsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2002The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently decided an important case concerning motor carrier obligations to contribute to union trust funds for their independent contractor owner operators in Mazzei v. Rock-N-Around Trucking, Inc., 246 F.3d 956 (7th Cir., 4/6/2001).
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.