Exhaustion of administrative remedies clarified?By Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, May 2007The Appellate Court in Illinois Health Maintenance Guar. Ass’n v. Department of Ins. left as many questions unanswered as it clarified regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies.
Necessary parties—Strict adherence againBy Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, September 2006On July 21st, 2006 the First District rendered its opinion in Catamount Cargo Serv. v. Illinois Dep’t of Employment Serv. This case relating to necessary parties follows a long line of cases strictly interpreting the Administrative Review Law.
Proper exhaustion of administrative remedies?By Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, August 2006The majority of the Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States recently declared that an appellant must PROPERLY exhaust administrative remedies before pursuing a claim in Federal Court. Woodford v. Ngo, 126 U.S. 2378 (2006).
City of Chicago adjudication withstands challenge againBy Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, February 2006Once again, the City of Chicago's scheme for adjudication of Municipal violations has been upheld after a challenge in Dombrowski v. City of Chicago.
Exhaustion revisitedBy Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, October 2005The First District recently ruled in a series of appeals from administrative review actions under the caption Illinois Health Maintenance Org. Guarantee Ass'n v. Shapo.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
