AI Information for In-House Counsel
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Corporate Law Departments,
May 2024
An overview of the three CLE programs on artificial intelligence sponsored by the Corporate Law Departments Section.
U.S. Trademark Office Halves Response Times
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
December 2022
Effective Dec. 3, 2022, the current standard six months due date to respond to a trademark office action is halved to three; for post-registration matters the cleavage is effective Oct. 7, 2023. A three-month extensions to the initial three-month due date may be available for $125. <www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-22217>
The Status of Interactions With Rospatent
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel, J.D.
Intellectual Property,
June 2022
Russia invaded Ukraine. The United States, the EU, and other nations sanctioned Russia. On March 22, 2022, the USPTO terminated engagement with Rospatent, Belarus IP Office, and the Eurasian Patent Organization.
Copyright Derivative Works and Section 203: A Tale of Two Phanatics
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
March 2022
Is a baseball mascot merely a costume, a work of art, or something else? If the artist wants to reclaim the copyright, can the team use a derivative version of the original design after the termination of its license in the original, and how does when the new mascot was created interact with the Copyright Act’s termination provision?
Sharing the Wealth: Student-Athletes After NCAA v. Alston
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
December 2021
For decades, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) had a simple rule: Student-athletes could not benefit financially from their skills on the playing field. Beginning with the “Sanity Code” in 1948 and continuing with some evolutions to 2021, the NCAA sought to limit the schools’ ability to offer financial incentives to preferred students. On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in NCAA v. Alston, upholding injunctions based upon antitrust law which lifted limitations on certain payments by schools and conferences.
Copyright Trolls in the Construction Business
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
June 2021
There are two main lessons to take from this article. First, copyright trolls will thrive as long as their targets are unfamiliar with decisions such as Lexington Homes and Signature Construction, and decide it is easier to pay a fee to avoid litigation. Second, in an industry where design elements are limited and certain combinations are expected, copyright infringement requires direct and unquestionable copying for liability. Merely echoing certain elements is insufficient to sustain a claim.
Copyright Trolls in the Construction Business
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
May 2021
There are two main lessons to take from this article. First, copyright trolls will thrive as long as their targets are unfamiliar with decisions such as Lexington Homes and Signature Construction, and decide it is easier to pay a fee to avoid litigation. Second, in an industry where design elements are limited and certain combinations are expected, copyright infringement requires direct and unquestionable copying for liability. Merely echoing certain elements is insufficient to sustain a claim.
Pirate Joe sails away
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
November 2017
Pirate Joe’s buys lots of goods at retail from Trader Joe’s in Bellingham, WA and resells them at Pirate Joe's Vancouver, Canada store. Trader Joe’s stores are located only in the USA. Trader Joe’s Lanham Act complaint claimed reputation, health, and safety concerns because perishable items were subject to varying temperatures, creating a health risk. Ninth Circuit, following precedent that the Lanham Act’s “use in commerce” requirement is separate from the jurisdictional grant, as they appear in different sections of the Act, and thus the federal courts unquestionably have subject matter jurisdiction over Lanham Act cases, decided only “some effect” on USA commerce was required for jurisdiction, and remanded to address the case merits. Then the parties settled.
Trademark infringement for unicorn beverages is no fantasy
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
June 2017
Montauk Juice Factory filed, January 2017, a trademark application for “Unicorn Latte,” and its The End Brooklyn cafe started serving the “healing beverage” late 2016. Starbucks promoted its limited-edition “Unicorn Frappuccino” in April 2017. The Juice was upset Starbucks horned in.
Ten cybersecurity tips for lawyers
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
January 2017
Lawyers have an ethical obligation to protect their clients’ information. Electronic records add accessibility—and responsibility. Cybersecurity tips include Change the Password Often, Consider Dual Authentication, Limit Access to Need-to-Know, Disable Passwords When People Leave, Plan for Cyber Incidents, Train Staff and Attorneys, Document with NDAs, Investigate Your Vendors, Review Policies and Processes.
Musicians vs. politicians – The saga continues
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
September 2016
Popular music has historically had political aspects. Politicians love music, using it to underscore their platforms, highlight their entrances, and set a tone for their campaigns. But musicians don’t always want politicians using their music. Several recent disputes are summarized.
Update from TM5 at the INTA 137th Annual Meeting
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
August 2015
The members of TM5 began by each presenting information about the work handled by their respective offices, including the number of applications filed in 2014; effect of the Madrid system; and any improvement in processing, especially in the time period for examination.
Food fights in the Chicago trademark arena
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
September 2009
Some foods inspire legions of fans, some of whom will go to great lengths to obtain their particular delicacy. Who can forget the episode of “M*A*S*H” where Hawkeye Pierce places a takeout order with Adam’s Ribs in Chicago and then arranges to have them delivered to the 4077?
“Hope,” charity, and copyright—Fair use or derivative work?
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
May 2009
While unlikely to make new law in the area of copyright, derivative works, and fair use, the Fairey v. AP case could provide a new distinction between fair use and derivative works for political images.
“One day you’re in…..” – Louis Vuitton’s recent trademark cases
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
May 2008
On the Bravo Channel’s Project Runway reality show, host Heidi Klum warns designers “in fashion, one day you’re in, the next day, you’re out.” Louis Vuitton, a division of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA, recently learned the same can be said in trademark courts, as it won a case and lost a case within a week of each other.
Drawing a line between art and copyright
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
January 2008
Art can also be the center of intellectual property controversies, as recent charges of copyright infringement have shown.
Pulling the Plug on “The Electric (Slide)”
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
March 2007
Thousands of guests at weddings, bas mitzvah, Sweet Sixteen parties, company holiday gatherings, and other events have been cajoled into joining a line dance called “The Electric Slide” over the last thirty years.
What’s in a name?
By Margo Lynn Hablutzel
Intellectual Property,
January 2007
Recent activity in the UK and USA have highlighted a celebrity’s use of name or nickname as a trademark.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author