Is it possible to file a 19(h) petition more than 30 months after a final award?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2006The answer is: It depends. In Kenneth W. Behe v. Industrial Commission, 2006 WL 1382058 2nd District May 5, 2006 the Appellate Court discusses the issue of how many 19(h) Petitions can be filed.
Co-editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2006Congratulations go out to our Chair, John Adams, Vice Chair, Deborah Benzing and Secretary, John Sheperd, as well as all of the lecturers who presented the ISBA with two educational seminars in February of this year.
Co-Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2006MCLE (minimum, not mandatory, continuing legal education) is here. The officers of the Workers’ Compensation Section, John Adams, Deborah Benzing, John Shepard, the co-editors and all of the counsel section members are working to deliver quality material to assist you in meeting your bi-yearly requirements.
Co-editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, August 2005A message from Editor Rich Hannigan.
Co-editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2005As of this writing sweeping amendments have been added to the Act and placed before the Governor. There is every reason to believe that by the time you read this, they will be signed into law.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2005If you blinked you may have missed the flurry of activity at the Commission.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2004A message from Editor Rich Hannigan.
Industrial Commission newsBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2004By the time this newsletter is received by your office there may be amendments to the Workers' Compensation Act.
Clerical error. When is the proper time to file a Review?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2004The appellate court seems to deal with this issue once every four years. In Diane Schultz v Forest Preserve District of Cook County, 1-02-2860 WC filed by the First District Appellate Court, Industrial Commission Division revisited that issue.
Commission newsBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2004Updates of interest to workers' comp law practitioners.
When filing a summons for the employer, make sure the principal signs the bondBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2004In Freedom Graphic Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, the appellate court addresses the issue of whether section 19(f) requires "strict compliance" when a bond is filed with the circuit court but unsigned.
Commission NewsBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2003Updates from the Illinois Industrial Commission.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2003Gerald F. Cooper has completed a successful term as Chairperson of the Workers' Compensation Law Council Section.
Sisbro revisitedBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2003What if everyone agreed that the employee had a pre-existing condition that had so far deteriorated that any activity could or might cause the employee to become disabled and require treatment?
Hearing loss—Who is liable?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003In our April, 2002 newsletter, Steve Grady discussed Hamilton v. Industrial Commission, 326 Ill.App.3d 602; 761 N.E.2d 775; 260 Ill.Dec. 592. Since then, the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois accepted the case and has affirmed the appellate court.
Injury at picnic voluntary/mandatory attendanceBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003On September 18, 1998 the claimant was at a company picnic and was playing basketball on the company parking lot when he injured his right knee.
Is a juror an employee of the county?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003The appellate court of Illinois Third District answered that question in the negative.
Parking lot injury/lot not “provided for” by employerBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003Whether an injury in a parking is compensable may depend upon whether the lot was "provided for" by the employer.
Res judicata/collateral estoppel/rule of the caseBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003The claimant filed a 19(b), alleging that as a result of a fall on January 21, 1991 he injured his left knee, neck, and back.
Section 16 fees and costsBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003On February 5, 2003 the Appellate Court Second Division filed it's decision involving James Williams v. Industrial Commission.
Where have our mentors gone?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2003If we want, we can learn from everyone we come in contact with.
Notes from the co-editorsBy Paul W. Wiedner & Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2003As reported in the last newsletter, Commissioner Richard Madigan resigned effective July 8, 2002 from the Illinois Industrial Commission. Paul Rink accepted a temporary assignment as the public member. Mr. Rink's appointment expires December 31, 2002.
Notes from the editorBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, October 2002Commissioner Robert Madigan resigned effective July 8, 2002. Paul Rink has accepted a temporary appointment to serve as the public-member (Panel A) through December 31, 2002.
19(b)1 is no place for rehabBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2002On February 1, 2002 the appellate court filed it's decision on Mobil Oil Corp. vs. Industrial Commission (David Haberkorn). At the time of this publication the decision is not final and subject to change.
Commissioners of the Industrial CommissionBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2002For those of you who are not familiar with the Commissioner's who hear your oral 19(h) and 8(a) petitions, hear oral argument, rule on your motions at the review level and administer to the functioning of the Industrial Commission, a brief note is in order.
The common fund doctrine/entitlement to attorney feesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2002The Illinois Supreme Court has reaffirmed the application of the common fund doctrine to the recoupment of attorney fees from a third party group carrier who made payment of medical bills pursuant to it's group policy.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.