Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, July 2011An introduction to the issue from Co-Editor Stan Kaminski.
Acquisition of company assets may include hidden unclaimed property liabilitiesBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, May 2011To combat the potential unclaimed property problem, a purchasing company should consider adding a provision to the acquisition agreement dealing with past or existing unclaimed property.
A note from the Co-EditorsBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, April 2011An introduction to the issue from co-editors Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley Kaminski.
A note from the Co-EditorsBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, February 2011An introduction to the issue from Co-Editors Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley Kaminski.
Content-based tax exemptions and the First AmendmentBy Stanley R. Kaminski & David I. CurkovicState and Local Taxation, January 2011The Illinois Supreme Court recently issued their opinion in Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook.
A note from the Co-EditorsBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, January 2011An introduction to the issue from co-editors Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, April 2010An introduction to the issue from Editor Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, March 2010A message from the editor of the Tax Trends newsletter.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, February 2010This issue of Tax Trends has a review of two different cases.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, January 2010This issue contains an article by Julie-April Montgomery on the Cook County Department of Administrative Hearings and its new administrative hearing system.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, December 2009The assertion of “reasonable cause” as a rationale to abate penalties is a commonly used argument by taxpayers. Yet, since it is applied on a case-by-case basis and its application sometimes varies among taxing agencies, it is sometimes unclear whether it can apply in a given case and in many cases it is even more difficult to demonstrate.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, November 2009An introduction to the issue from Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, October 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, September 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, July 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Stanley Kaminski.
A note from the Co-EditorBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, May 2009An introduction to the issue from co-editor Stanley Kaminski.
A note from the co-editorsBy Stanley R. Kaminski & Mary Ann ConnellyState and Local Taxation, April 2009An introduction to the issue from co-editors Stanley Kaminski and Mary Ann Connelly.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, January 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, November 2008This issue of Tax Trends contains two quite different articles on state taxes.
January 2008 IDOR Practitioners MeetingsBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, April 2008Questions and answers from the January, 2008 Illinois Department of Revenue Practitioners Meeting.
Case summaryBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, February 2008Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. Cook County, City of Chicago, et al, Ill. App. Court. (1st Dist. 12\21\2007)
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.