Public sector discipline: September 2009 Term of the Supreme Court
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
December 2009
In re Gable, Commission No. 08 CH 67, S. Ct. No. M.R. 23234 (September 22, 2009). Jarrett Ward Gable was an Assistant Public Defender in Cook County during the misconduct in question. On May 28, 2006, he was arrested at a music festival in Peoria and was charged with two counts of possession of psilocybin, a controlled substance that acts as a hallucinogen.
Former Assistant Public Defender Suspended Until Further Order
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
March 2007
In September 2003, Julie Baldwin entered into a contract to serve as a part-time assistant public defender in Peoria County, where she was assigned to represent indigent parents in cases in which her clients faced the possibility of termination of their parental rights.
Former Assistant Public Defender suspended
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
December 2006
While she was employed as an assistant Kane County public defender, Cynthia Sutherin approached three of her colleagues at the Public Defender’s office, as well as another attorney employed by the Kane County State’s Attorney, telling them that she was going to open a law firm with two other assistant public defenders.
Ethics corner: Recent censure of a public sector lawyer
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
April 2006
On January 13, 2006, the Illinois Supreme Court censured Justin T. Fitzsimmons for professional misconduct committed during the course of his employment as an assistant state’s attorney in DuPage County.
In-sites
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
February 2005
In the November 2003 edition of this newsletter, I introduced you to the ARDC's Web site and told you that portions of the site were still under construction.
Ethics corner
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
November 2003
Although part of the Web site is still “under construction,” public information about Illinois attorneys, an explanation of the operation of the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (“ARDC”) rules, and links to use for researching ethics issues are currently available at: .
Our first CLE program—A rave review
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
December 2002
On September 19, 2002, the Standing Committee on Government Lawyers sponsored, in conjunction with the ABA's Government & Public Sector Lawyers Division, a continuing legal education program produced by and for government lawyers.
“Taking the Fifth” at an administrative hearing
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
December 2002
During contested cases before administrative tribunals, it sometimes happens that a witness refuses to testify on the ground that his answer might tend to incriminate him.
Government lawyers and the attorney-client privilege
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
August 2002
In In re: A Witness Before the Special Grand Jury 2000-2, No. 01-3386 (7th Cir. April 23, 2002), the Seventh Circuit addressed, at the request of a state official, whether his government attorney could refuse to answer questions posed by a grand jury on the basis of attorney-client privilege.
Ethics corner
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan & Susan Cox
Government Lawyers,
October 2001
In re Schaaf, No. M.R. 17387 (March 23, 2001). Respondent, who was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1994, began working as a part-time assistant state's attorney in Jersey County, while he was also engaged in private practice; he was hired as a full-time assistant state's attorney in April 1999.
Someone you should know: Jim Grogan
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Government Lawyers,
October 2001
Do you have a question about legal ethics? Or maybe a question about judicial ethics? If you are among the seemingly endless list of his friends or acquaintances, you would pick up the phone and call Jim Grogan.
“Taking the Fifth” at an administrative hearing
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Environmental and Natural Resources Law,
May 2000
During contested cases before administrative tribunals, it sometimes happens that a witness refuses to testify on the ground that his answer might tend to incriminate him.
“Taking the Fifth” at an administrative hearing
By Rosalyn B. Kaplan
Administrative Law,
April 2000
During contested cases before administrative tribunals, it sometimes happens that a witness refuses to testify on the ground that his answer might tend to incriminate him.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author