Burrink Commercial Services v. New Life Covenant ChurchBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, May 2024In Burrink Commercial Services v. New Life Covenant Church, the appellate court dismissed a complaint to foreclose a mechanics lien as factually insufficient because the complaint improperly characterized two contracts as one.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, May 2024An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, April 2024An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, December 2023An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, August 2023An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, May 2023An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, March 2023An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, December 2022An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, August 2022An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, April 2022An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, January 2022An introduction to the issue from the editor.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, August 2021An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Don’t Lien on Me: Reprioritization of Mechanics LiensBy Samuel H. LevineReal Estate Law, June 2021Mechanics lien statutes are a delicate balance among the rights of owners, contractors, secondary subcontractors, and lenders.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, May 2021An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, February 2021An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, July 2020An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel Levine.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, April 2020An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, January 2020An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, October 2019An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, July 2019An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, January 2019An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, December 2018An introduction to the issue by Samuel H. Levine.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, August 2018An introduction to the issue by Samuel Levine.
Whose law is it?By Samuel H. LevineCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, August 2018Two recent cases, Z.B., NA v. Hoeller and Bonita Real Estate v. SLF IV Lending, attempt to answer which law governs a deficiency when the choice-of-law provisions in the promissory note and mortgage are in conflict.
Editor’s ColumnBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, May 2018An introduction to the issue from Samuel Levine.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.