Section Newsletters

Articles From Bernard Z. Paul

The three standards of review and procedural default on administrative review By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, July 2008 Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Board et al concerns a challenge to Cinkus’ nomination papers heard before the municipal electoral board.
Chair’s column By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, August 2007 The Administrative Law Section Council held its organizational meeting on Thursday, June 21, 2007 in Fontana, Wisconsin.
Chair’s column By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, July 2007 A message from Chair Bernard Paul.
Illinois Health Maintenance Org. Guarantee Ass’n v. Department of Ins., additional issues By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, May 2007 The recent Illinois Appellate Court case of Illinois Health Maintenance Org. Guarantee Ass’n v. Department of Insurance, consolidated with University of Chicago Hospitals v. Manna, was decided by a divided appellate court on March 5, rehearing denied March 30, 2007.
A previous court ruling of invalidity of an agency’s rule does not necessarily bar attorney fees in a subsequent case By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, October 2005 The Appellate Court for the Second District recently heard, and decided in a supplemental opinion, a petition for attorney fees under the Expense and Attorney Fees Statute found in the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act.
Recusal and disqualification of members of administrative boards By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, January 2005 A summary of Girot v. Keith.
Action may not be taken at a regular meeting of a public body unless the subject of the action is specifically set forth in the agenda for the meeting By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, November 2003 Early last year, the appellate court ruled that action may not be taken at a regular meeting of a public body unless the subject matter of the action was explicitly provided for in the agenda for the meeting.
When is a joinder of additional causes of action with a complaint for administrative review permissible under Illinois law? By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, June 2001 Two recent reviewing courts addressed this issue of what causes of action may be joined with a complaint for Administrative Review.
False denial of guilt in an administrative hearing may be considered as a factor in determining the sanction upon a finding against the respondent By Bernard Z. Paul Administrative Law, February 2000 An administrative agency is entitled in determining a sanction to consider lack of truthfulness by the respondent, not only in testimony before the agency during a hearing, but also during the course of an agency's investigation.

Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.

Select a Different Author