Vision Point v. Haas: Breathing room For litigants on Requests to Admit
By Steven G. Pietrick
Family Law,
March 2008
On September 20, 2007, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, ___ Ill.2d___, 2007 WL 2729322 (No. 103140 September 20, 2007),1 providing what many in the legal community perceive as a merciful relaxation of the overly strict interpretation of Rule 216’s requirements and the near-draconian effects which can result.
Vision Point v. Haas: Breathing room For litigants on Requests to Admit
By Steven G. Pietrick
Civil Practice and Procedure,
October 2007
On September 20, 2007, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, providing what many in the legal community perceive as a merciful relaxation of the overly strict interpretation of Rule 216’s requirements and the near-draconian effects which can result.
The “empty chair” defense at trial
By Steven G. Pietrick
Civil Practice and Procedure,
January 2007
It is common for defense attorneys to speak of pointing to an “empty chair” at trial in order to shift the responsibility from their client to another entity which is not a party in the case.
Professional conduct issues affecting civil practice
By Steven G. Pietrick
Civil Practice and Procedure,
September 1999
Editors' Note: The Board of Governors of the ISBA has asked that all section councils and committees discuss ethical concerns relating to the work of those groups.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author