Articles From Corey B. Stern

Illinois Supreme Court construes indemnity provision to require indemnitor to indemnify indemnitee from its own negligence By Corey B. Stern Energy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, March 2008 In Buenz v. Frontline Transp. Co., 2008 WL 217169 (Ill., Jan. 2008), the Illinois Supreme Court held that the language in an interchange agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) between two carriers required the first carrier to indemnify the second carrier for any and all claims, even claims based on the second carrier’s negligence.
Seventh Circuit affirms injunction against city’s ban on truck traffic By Corey B. Stern Energy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2005 In Crest Hill Land Development, LLC. v. City of Joliet, No. 04-2565 (01/25/05), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a trial court judgment which enjoined the City of Joliet from banning truck traffic on a locally designated highway.
Seventh Circuit addresses COGSA, the Hague Rules and Illinois bailment law in non-Carmack cargo litigation By Corey B. Stern Energy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2003 In Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, as subrogee of Lowe's Companies, Inc., v. Hanjin Shipping Company, O'Hare Services, and Channel Distribution, Case Nos. 02-2822 and 02-2933 (7th Cir. 10/31/03), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit has held that plaintiff Indemnity Insurance Company of North America ("Indemnity") could not recover damages from defendant Hanjin Shipping Company ("Hanjin") on an international shipment that moved under Hanjin's waybill.
Seventh Circuit sets standards for measuring Carmack damages By Corey B. Stern Energy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 2003 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has addressed important liability and damage issues arising out of litigation brought against motor carriers under the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. §14706. In American Nat'l Fire Insurance Co. as subrogee of Tabacalera Contreras Cigar Co. v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Case Nos. 02-1639 and 02-1741 (7th Cir. 1/10/03), the court held that the plaintiff subrogee American Nat'l Fire Insurance Co. (National Insurance) had established its case against the defendant motor carrier Yellow and was entitled to recover damages for freight, taxes, fees, and insurance on the damaged portion of the shipment at issue.

Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.

Select a Different Author