Winston and Lockett: The legacy continuesBy Carl R. DraperAdministrative Law, May 2015Two of the most important decisions to understand have been specifically identified as potential traps for the unwary when filing a complaint under the Administrative Review Law.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. Schoenbaum, Jr.Administrative Law, March 2015Summaries of recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
A trio of casesBy Barbara J. BellAdministrative Law, March 2015Summaries of Baldermann v. Chicago Ridge Police Pension Board, Ron James v. the Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al, and Kinsella v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. Schoenbaum, Jr. & J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, February 2015Summaries of recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
Effective January 1, 2015, legislation authorizes out-of-state counsel to appear before state agencies as provided by Supreme Court Rule 707By J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, February 2015Public Act 98-895, signed and approved by Governor Quinn on August 15, 2014, provides that out-of-state counsel attorneys licensed in another state, territory, or commonwealth of the United States, the District of Columbia, or a foreign country may appear before a hearing officer, administrative law judge, or other adjudicatory officer or body of a department of state government as provided in Illinois Supreme Court Rule 707.
Recent casesBy Barbara J. BellAdministrative Law, February 2015Summaries of the recent cases of Robbins v. Department of State Police Merit Board and Richard Reimer v. the Retirement Board of the Fireman’s Annuity & Fund of Chicago.
Federal regulatory agendasBy William A. PriceAdministrative Law, December 2014The federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) recently released a six-month update of the Unified Agenda, which lists federal regulations currently pending and planned.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. Schoenbaum, Jr.Administrative Law, July 2014Recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
Food for thought—HartneyBy Jewel N. KleinAdministrative Law, July 2014A follow-up to the author's article that was published in the May issue of this newsletter.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, May 2014Recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
In other words, we told everybody to start over and do it rightBy Carolyn Welch CliffordAdministrative Law, May 2014A look at the four procedural lessons set forth in the recent Howe v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago decision.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, February 2014Recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
Mandamus denied for DumasBy J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, February 2014On February 7, 2014, the Illinois Appellate Court reiterated a long-standing principle of law relating to mandamus relief.
Administrative law case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, January 2014Recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
The importance of protocolsBy Erin M. HughesAdministrative Law, January 2014In CBS Outdoor, Inc., v. The Department of Transportation,) 111387, the timeline and protocols of the Illinois Department of Transportation are imperative to the issuance of the sign permit.
License revocation upheldBy Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, January 2014In the recent unpublished opinion of Addy v. City of Chicago Department of Administrative Hearings, the first District Appellate Court recently upheld revocation of appellant’s Chauffeur license. The order is instructive.
Administrative law case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, December 2013Recent cases of interest to administrative law practitioners.
Standards for administrative reviewBy Jewel N. KleinAdministrative Law, December 2013Two recent cases, Medina Nursing Center, Inc. v. Health Facilities and Services Review Board and Heabler v. Ill. Dep’t. of Finance & Professional Regulations, offer important insights into the standards that the appellate courts use when reviewing administrative agency decisions.