Maker of George Foreman™ contact grill settles complaint with attorneys general of 45 statesBy Robert E. DrabaAdministrative Law, March 2003Section 1 of the Sherman Act provides that "Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal."
The next big thing in antitrustBy Spencer Weber WallerAdministrative Law, March 2003Although the Supreme Court has not taken many antitrust cases in recent years, this is about to change.
Recent cases of interestAdministrative Law, March 2003In re: Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25717, 52 Fed. Appx. 548 (2d Cir., 2002).
Antitrust issues in e-commerceBy Steven M. KowalSeptember 2000The e-commerce component of the nation's economy continues to grow at an astounding rate.
UCITA is coming! UCITA is coming! (One if by land, two if by C)By Eugene F. FriedmanSeptember 2000The Illinois General Assembly has recently witnessed the introduction of the Uniform Computer Information Transfer Act ("UCITA"), 1999 Illinois Senate Bill 1309.
Downstate road contractor violated Illinois Antitrust ActBy Marija PopovicApril 2000The Illinois Attorney General filed suit against two contractors of road oil, Debrun and Hausmann, on April 6, 1998 in the Illinois Circuit Court of the Forth Judicial Circuit in Fayette County, Illinois.
Litigation corner: the use of survey evidenceApril 2000Counsel in a case involving an issue of economic power, marketing practices or other general activities should give consideration to the use of a survey in lieu of numerous, expensive, geographically dispersed third-party depositions.