Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. Schoenbaum & J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, March 2011Recent cases of interest to the administrative law practitioner.
Cases of interest… The Emanuel decisions and a recent unfair labor practice decisionBy J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, March 2011Summaries of the recent cases of Maksym v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago and Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Pace Northwest Division v. Illinois Labor Relations Bd., State Panel, and Urszula T. Panikowski.
Case summariesBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, January 2011Recent cases of interest to the administrative law practitioner.
Case law updateGovernment Lawyers, December 2002The circuit court did not err when it denied defendant's motion to transfer venue in a mandamus action seeking to compel defendant agency to comply with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act with regard to a union complaint that "the hospital had failed to comply with the conditions of its construction permit relating to local union issues."
People v. DavisBy Marina ParaCriminal Justice, December 2002In July 1998, Larion Jackson, his brother Chris, and several friends were on a porch outside the Jackson home.
Case summariesBy Hon. Terrence J. Brady & Alfred M. Swanson, Jr.Bench and Bar, July 2002This appears to be the first decision in a court of review to specifically hold that after 30 days, a case dismissed for want of prosecution (DWP) may be reinstated, and does not require refiling.
Case law updateBy Holly-Joy SchroetlinAlternative Dispute Resolution, November 2001As a prerequisite to her employment at Circuit City, Gannon signed its Dispute Resolution Agreement which provided that all employment-related claims against Circuit City be handled exclusively through binding arbitration.
Case summariesBench and Bar, October 2001American Service Insurance Company v. Olszewski, No. 1-01-0515 (1st Dist. August 20, 2001). The requirement in Supreme Court Rule 213(f) that, upon interrogatory, a party disclose the identity of witnesses he intends to call to testify at trial and the subject matter of their testimony is mandatory.
Case law updateBy Don C. HammerFamily Law, March 2001In Re Adoption of D. (2-99-1245) Mother, and Mother's new husband, sought to adopt Mother's child. Petitioners sought to terminate the parental rights of the presumed father for willful desertion and/or abandonment.
Case summary—attorney has duty to report fraud to ARDCBy Robert T. ParkCivil Practice and Procedure, May 2000Skolnick v. Altheimer & Gray (3/23/00)--Plaintiff attorney was investigated by the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Committee (ARDC) based on letters sent to the ARDC by his law firm and one of its member lawyers
Book reviewAlternative Dispute Resolution, March 2000The Heart of Conflict represents a departure from most of the other books reviewed in the newsletter.
Caselaw updateBy Dean M. FriedersAlternative Dispute Resolution, February 2000Both parties were involved in an automobile accident, in which appellant conceded liability.
Recent casesBy Barry H. Greenburg & Jacalyn BirnbaumFamily Law, January 2000Appellate court reversed trial court's denial of public guardian's motion to withdraw on the basis that public guardian had failed to identify any conflict in his representation.
Massachusetts district court denies summary judgment in concealed damage case where claim filed thirteen months after deliveryBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Norpin Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. CTS Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc., 1999 WL 754038 (D. Mass.) ____F. Supp. 3d ____ (decided 9/21/99), the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motor carrier's motion for summary judgment in a cargo loss and damage claim brought under the Carmack Amendment at 49 U.S.C. §14706 even though the plaintiff shipper's initial claim for cargo damage was not filed with the defendant motor carrier until thirteen months after delivery.
Recent appellate court casesBy David P. Bergschneider & Donald R. ParkinsonCriminal Justice, December 1999The State sought civil commitment of the defendant in this case as a sexually violent person. The defendant had been previously convicted of criminal sexual assault and indecent liberties with a child in 1984.
Recent Illinois Supreme Court decisionBench and Bar, December 1999In Tosado v. Miller, S. Ct. Doc. No. 84712 (Oct. 21, 1999), the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the appellate court that in medical malpractice actions against public entities or their employees a one-year rather than a two-year statute of limitations applies (293 Ill. App. 3d 544), resolving conflicting decisions from that court.
Seventh Circuit holds that an employee can be liable for a corporation’s discovery abuseBy Michael Todd ScottCorporate Law Departments, December 1999In Johnson v. Kakvand, No. 97-3893 (7th Cir. Sept. 17, 1999), the Plaintiffs sued Liberty Mortgage Corp. (Liberty) and it's president and sole shareholder, Mike Kakvand, alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act.
U.S. District Court finds Carmack Amendment claim against property broker does not preempt state law claimsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Custom Cartage, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 1999 WL 89563 (N.D. Ill. 2/16/99), Custom filed a declaratory judgment suit against Motorola in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois wherein it asserted that because it was a property broker, it owed nothing to Motorola after one million dollars worth of goods were stolen from a truck which Custom had hired to move Motorola's freight from Harvard, IL to Miami, FL.
U.S. District Court grants partial summary judgment against contract carrier in Carmack Amendment litigationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Custom Cartage, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 1999 WL 965686 (N.D. Ill., 10/15/99), Motorola brought a Carmack Amendment claim under 49 U.S.C. §14706(a)(1) against J&P Transport and moved for summary judgment against that entity as the originating carrier on a load of telephones that moved from Harvard, IL and to Miami, FL and was short one million dollars worth of cargo on arrival at destination.
Caselaw updateBy Dean M. FriedersAlternative Dispute Resolution, November 1999The Texas Fourth District Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling holding that Garcia violated a mediation settlement agreement when he moved to set aside the agreement which itself was entered into to settle a trust dispute
Lease Resolution Corporation v. LarneyBy Austin W. BartlettBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, November 1999In a case of first impression, the First District was faced with the issue of whether to adopt the adverse domination doctrine to toll the statute of limitations for claims by a plaintiff corporation against wrongdoing board members and non-board member co-conspirators.
Recent appellate court opinions in briefBench and Bar, November 1999In Stork, the appellate court had this to say about the kind of appellate advocacy before it
Recent appellate court casesBy David P. Bergschneider & Donald R. ParkinsonCriminal Justice, October 1999The defendant, Terry S. Duke, had been sentenced to 35 years in prison for rape (Class X felony) and a consecutive 2 1/2 year sentence for the possession of contraband in a penal institution.
Timing is everythingBy Bernard WysockiGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, October 1999Recently the 5th District Appellate Court held that a Circuit Court properly denied a plaintiff's motion to rescind a settlement agreement between the plaintiff and his employer in which the plaintiff and employer satisfied an employer's lien against the proceeds of a plaintiff's legal malpractice suit.
Willful destruction of documents during civil discovery can lead to criminal obstruction of justice chargesBy Dana SilverCorporate Law Departments, October 1999In United States v. Lundwall, 1 F. Supp. 2d 249 (1998), the United States District Court ruled that an alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1503, obstruction of justice, reaches the willful destruction of documents during civil discovery. The statute had never been applied in the context of civil discovery.
Wyoming v. Houghton: The pendulum continues its swing to the rightBy Daniel T. GillespieTraffic Laws and Courts, October 1999Twenty years ago, then Justice Rehnquist joined Justice Blackmun's dissent in Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 99 S. Ct. 2586, 61 L. Ed. 2d 235 (1979), urging the Court to adopt a clear-cut rule to the effect that a warrant should not be required to seize and search personal property found in an automobile that may in turn be seized and searched without a warrant pursuant to Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 69 L. Ed. 543, 45 S. Ct. 280 (1925) and Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S. Ct. 1975, 26 L. Ed. 2d 419 (1970).
Recent appellate court casesBy David P. Bergschneider & Donald R. ParkinsonCriminal Justice, September 1999The defendant was convicted by a jury of the offenses of residential burglary, aggravated unlawful restraint and aggravated criminal sexual assault.
Recent appellate court opinions in briefBench and Bar, September 1999People v. Davis, 304 Ill. App. 3d 427 (2nd Dist. 1999, Rapp, J.). Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of first degree murder and felonies and sentenced to imprisonment.