2003 significant criminal legislationBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, December 2003NOTE:
• 15-20-25 to life info: HB5652 from the 92d G.A. failed to pass in the December 2002 veto session
Redeploy IllinoisBy Betsy ClarkeChild Law, December 2003Redeploy Illinois is now law-providing a plan to develop local incentive funding to reduce juvenile commitments to corrections.
“Be it enacted…”By Matt MaloneyCriminal Justice, September 2003Many of the ISBA Section Councils spend a great deal of time each Spring reviewing new legislation that has been introduced in both the Illinois House and Senate.
People v. BlaylockBy Sandra BlakeCriminal Justice, September 2003In 1993, the defendant, Camerun Blaylock, was charged with six counts of home invasion and five counts of first degree murder.
People v. JacksonBy Kimberly L. DahlenCriminal Justice, September 2003In a case of first impression, the Illinois Supreme Court reversed the trial and appellate courts, holding that, in a criminal bench trial, the State may not introduce evidence relating to a witness' polygraph test "for a limited purpose" if that purpose had not been established prior to the admission of the evidence.
Case summariesBy Alfred M. Swanson, Jr. & Willis R. TriblerBench and Bar, August 2003People v. Terrell, 5-02-0367 (5th Dist. 6/11/2003) (Chapman, J.). Defendant was acquitted in a bench trial of attempted murder, but convicted of solicitation of murder.
Case summariesBy Michael Kiley & Alfred M. Swanson, Jr.Bench and Bar, June 2003The defendant appealed his conviction on two counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault.
Food for thought—How far will we go?By Matt MaloneyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2003Many of the ISBA Section Councils spend a great deal of time each spring reviewing new legislation that has been introduced in both the Illinois House and Senate.
Case law updateCriminal Justice, May 2003Danville police officers, while observing two females sitting in a pickup truck, noticed a bottle of beer in the center console. Suspecting underage drinking, they stopped to identify both individuals.
Enacted criminal legislation 2002: Part IIBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, May 2003Amends the Liquor Control Act of 1934. Provides that local liquor commissioners have the duty to report to the Secretary of State any conviction for a violation of the Act's provision, or a similar provision of a local ordinance, prohibiting a person under 21 from purchasing, accepting, possessing, or consuming alcoholic liquor and prohibiting the transfer or alternation of identification cards, the use of the identification card of another or a false or forged identification card, or the use of false information to obtain an identification card.
One picture is worth a thousand wordsBy Matt MaloneyCriminal Justice, May 2003This is a time-tested concept that everyone understands. In the New World of covert and surreptitious surveillance, you never know when you might be photographed or recorded on live camera.
Case summariesBy Hon. Michael Kiley, Hon. Eddie Stevens, & Alfred M. Swanson, Jr.Bench and Bar, March 2003The defendant was found guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. On appeal, the defendant contended, inter alia, that it was error to allow the State to introduce evidence that the defendant refused to submit to breath alcohol testing by way of a portable breath test instrument (PBT).
Enacted criminal legislation 2002: Part OneBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, February 2003Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Creates the offense of conspiracy against civil rights.
The lie detector as a psychological rubber hoseBy Bruce D. LocherCriminal Justice, February 2003This article focuses not on the "custodial" aspects of any of the police and/or DCFS contacts with the accused, but rather the effect of taking and failing a polygraph test on the issue of voluntariness.
What should a jury know about a defendant’s prior convictions?By Patrick J. HitpasGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2003An apparent inconsistency has developed in what information a trial court should allow a jury to hear regarding a defendant's prior convictions.
What you see…is what you getBy Matt MaloneyCriminal Justice, February 2003Ancient history (the 1960s) makes me think of this phrase often attributed to Flip Wilson and the great singing group The Dramatics. All defense lawyers face the specter of Strickland claims.
People v. HendersonBy Randall RosenbaumCriminal Justice, December 2002As a matter of first impression in the State, the Third District Appellate Court ruled it is error for a trial judge to refuse to exercise discretion in determining whether a plea should be accepted or rejected on its merits simply because an arbitrary plea deadline has passed.
Six-person juries in criminal casesBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, December 2002The subject of six-person juries has recently come up in DuPage County. Several local private attorneys choose to utilize them.
Recent decisions of the Illinois Supreme CourtBy David P. BergschneiderCriminal Justice, August 2001Defendant was convicted of two 1977 murders, and was sentenced to 40 to 80 years imprisonment.
Impact of plea of guilty on civil proceedingsBy Mark Rouleau & Steve BakerCriminal Justice, April 2001A plea is an admission of a party opponent. It is not conclusive in the civil litigation, however it is like a person saying at the time of the collision; "I'm sorry, I ran the red light."
Recent appellate court opinions in briefBy Alfred M. Swanson, Jr.Bench and Bar, October 2000What level of investigation is required to defeat an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel?
Single subject rule challenges a compendiumBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, September 2000In recent years we have heard of repeated challenges to the use of "Christmas tree bills" by the Legislature.
Invasion of privacy in Illinois: time for changeBy Martin A. DolanYoung Lawyers Division, August 2000Peeping Toms using binoculars and the like have always and unfortunately will continue to infest our world.
Passed bills*—91st General Assembly—2000By Steve BakerCriminal Justice, June 2000SB 730 Summary: Representation by counsel. In a juvenile proceeding, a minor who was under 13 years of age at the time of the commission of an act that if committed by an adult would be a violation of section 9-1, 9-1.2, 9-2, 9-2.1, 9-3, 9-3.2, 9-3.3, 12-13, 12-14, 12-14.1, 12-15, or 12-16 of the Criminal Code of 1961 must be represented by counsel during the entire custodial interrogation of the minor.
From the United States Supreme CourtBy Donald C. HudsonCriminal Justice, April 2000The respondent Wardlow fled upon seeing police officers patrolling an area known for heavy narcotics trafficking.
Single subject rule challengesBy Steve BakerCriminal Justice, April 2000Bills, except bills for appropriations and for the codification, revision or rearrangement of laws, shall be confined to one subject. Ill. Const. 1970, Art. IV, sec. 8(d).
Recent appellate court casesBy David P. Bergschneider & Donald R. ParkinsonCriminal Justice, November 1999At the request of the defendant's wife, two police officers accompanied her to the trailer that she was sharing with the defendant.
Criminal law practice tipsBy Matt MaloneyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, October 1999Lawyers, present company included, seem to forget ongoing admonitions from the Supreme Court when dealing with routine situations. While this may be a case of the "we always do things that way" attitude, the cost to the system continues to rise.