In re Sophia G.L.: A review of the UCCJEA in the State of IllinoisBy Michelle L. BlackburnGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, January 2009What is the status of the UCCJEA in the State of Illinois? According the Illinois Supreme Court, the UCCJEA is alive and well. The Illinois Supreme Court recently ruled on the case In re Sophia G.L., No. 104603, and in doing so overturned the decision of the 4th District Appellate Court, reversing the ruling of the Greene County Circuit Court.
Motions to stay pending appeal in custody casesBy Matthew A. KirshFamily Law, November 2008As most practitioners know, the conclusion of a contested custody trial is not, by a long shot, the end of the litigation.
Contested custody/Visitation litigation: A satireBy Roza Gossage & Pamela J. KuzniarBench and Bar, October 2008Years ago, super heroes held the values of our ancestors and would not father a child out of wedlock.
Supreme Court decision a win for custodial parents and a warning to employersBy Christina M. WebbYoung Lawyers Division, February 2008On November 29, 2007, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a $1,172,100 penalty pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Income Withholding for Support Act was constitutional as applied to an Illinois employer who failed to forward income withheld for child support in a timely manner.
Child custody statutes ready for a complete overhaulBy David N. SchafferFamily Law, July 2007On this, the thirtieth anniversary of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (“IMDMA”) 750 ILCS 5/1above01 et seq., it is clear that, at minimum, the section concerning child custody and visitation Id. at 5/601 – 5/608 needs a complete overhaul.
Contested custody / visitation litigation: A satireBy Roza Gossage & Pamela J. KuzniarFamily Law, April 2007Years ago, superheroes held the values of our ancestors and would not father a child out of wedlock.
Case law in child abuse and neglect and custody mattersBy Catherine M. RyanChild Law, December 2006During 2006, the Appellate Courts addressed the proper standards for a father in a neglect case, a grandparent in a custody case and a teacher appealing an indicated finding of abuse.
Preparing for an expedited appeal in child custody casesBy Stacey MandellChild Law, September 2006On July 1, 2004, the Illinois Supreme Court adopted Rule 306A, which established expedited appeals procedures in child custody cases.
Supreme court rules and custody: A summaryBy Hon. Barbara CrowderBench and Bar, June 2006The Supreme Court has established new rules that will dramatically change—and hopefully improve—custody and visitation procedures and outcomes.
Offers of proof: What are they and when do you need them?By Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, April 2006The trial court has entered an order which declares the dissolution of marriage complaint that was filed three months previous is: (1) set for trial in 60 days; and that if either party wanted to call more than two witnesses it had to request a pretrial conference seven (7) days before trial.
Legislative updateBy Sandra CrawfordWomen and the Law, October 2004It is the on-going commitment of the Women in the Law Committee to continue to actively monitor and comment on new and proposed legislation and to highlight existing laws of importance and interest to women and families.
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement ActBy Rory WeilerFamily Law, June 2004Effective January 1, 2004, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA)2 will supplant the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) and become the law of the land in Illinois, as it already has become in approximately 30 other states.
Why do we need to revamp custody?By Laura Urbik-KernRacial and Ethnic Minorities and the Law, May 2004In the 25 years since the custody act has been written, there has been much discussion among family lawyers about why the custody act is in need of overhaul.
Sole custody judgment diminishedBy James E. BuchmillerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2004It is somewhat customary for attorneys representing fathers of minor children in custody disputes to advise them that the best they can hope for is liberal visitation.
EditorialFamily Law, April 2003The Illinois State Bar Association's Family Law Section Council believes that our current custody and visitation provisions do not go far enough to prevent the damage the Dissolution process causes to families, and particularly, the children.
Family Law case updateBy Adrienne W. AlbrechtFamily Law, April 2003Cases issued between July, 2002 - February, 2003 and of interest to family law practitioners.
“My kid is gone”Family Law, April 2003There you are, sitting in your office trying to understand why anyone could possibly reject the very realistic and reasonable settlement proposal you have made in a case, when your mental meanderings are interrupted by a hysterical (potential) client telling you that their child has been snatched by the other parent, and taken out of the country.
Opening statementFamily Law, April 2003One of the most contentious areas of practice is in the determination of the custodian for children in dissolution proceedings.
Relocating a child born out of wedlock against the wishes of the non-custodial parentBy Adrienne W. AlbrechtFamily Law, December 2002For some time now, the appellate courts in Illinois have unanimously held that the custodial parent of a child born out of wedlock need not obtain leave of court before permanently locating the child out of Illinois.
Modification of joint custody agreementBy Anne M. MartinkusGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, October 2001The original 1977 Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, 750 ILCS 5, did not include any provisions for joint custody.
Recent casesBy Barry H. GreenburgFamily Law, May 2001Summaries of the recent cases of In Re the Marriage of Drury, In Re Petition of Mary Klak, In Re Marriage of Carter, In Re Shaddle, In re Adoption of D___, In Re Marriage of Lehr, In Re Marriage of Gattone, In Re J.P., In Re Marriage of Beerbridge, In Re the Marriage of Buck, In Re Marriage of Didier, In Re the Marriage of Petersen, In Re Donath v. Buckley, In Re Cerven and In Re Troy S. and Rachel S.