New overtime rule impacts exempt employeesBy Donald S. Rothschild & Brian M. DoughertyBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, September 2016On May 18, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor issued its Final Rule which made significant changes to EAP and HC employees’ salary and compensation levels. The Final Rule did not make any changes to the salary basis test or duties test. The Final Rule becomes effective on December 1, 2016.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act—New employer rights and responsibilitiesBy Michael R. LiedFederal Civil Practice, June 2016Businesses now can bring trade secret claims under federal as well as state law and can litigate trade secret claims in federal court without having to establish another basis for jurisdiction.
The IHRA: Extending protections for pregnant women in the workplaceBy Catherine D. Battista & Michael WongDiversity Leadership Council, June 2016The amendments to the Illinois Human Rights Act are a step in the right direction, but will likely create many logistical problems and headaches for Illinois employers as they seek to comply with the law.
Are flight attendants always traveling employees?By Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2016The appellate court answered this question earlier this year in United Airlines Inc. v. IWCC.
Replacing American workers with foreign workers may be discriminationBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, April 2016The INA’s anti-discrimination provision only prohibits intentional discrimination. This means that to engage in unlawful citizenship status discrimination, an employer must have acted “because of” citizenship or immigration status.
Staffing company may selectively use e-verifyBy Michael R. LiedInternational and Immigration Law, February 2016An employer that selectively creates E-Verify cases for employees based on citizenship status or national origin may violate the INA's anti-discrimination provision.
Supreme Court rulings to watchBy Carl R. DraperLabor and Employment Law, February 2016The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a couple of labor and employment cases that will be worth noting for all lawyers practicing employment law.
New limits on community college employment contractsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, December 2015The Public Community College Act was recently amended to impose certain limitations on employment contracts.
Protecting your employee handbooks and policies from attacks by the NLRBBy Mark A. SpognardiCorporate Law Departments, December 2015For almost a decade, the NLRB has devoted increasing attention to invalidating employer work rules which they deem to interfere with employees’ rights to organize.
Same-sex marriage ruling will impact employersBy Ken Sachs, Megan Norris, & James BoufidesEmployee Benefits, October 2015As a result of the ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, employers may want to change their policies to simply treat all married couples the same.
Illinois Human Rights Commission decision summaryBy Laura D. MrukLabor and Employment Law, September 2015A summary of the recent decision in Christopher Cross and Cook County, d/b/a Oak Forest Hospital of Cook County, Corporate Business Cards, Ltd. v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, Illinois Department of Human Rights, and William Kosmeija.
Independent truck driver vs. employeeBy Kenneth F. WertsWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2015An examination of Steel & Machinery Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Commission.
When do you qualify as a traveling employee?By Robert J. FinleyWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2015The traveling employee case generally presents an uncertain path to benefits due to the fact-specific nature of the inquiry.
Workplace wellness programs draw scrutiny from the EEOCBy Michael K. Chropowicz & Ronald J. PassarelliCorporate Law Departments, May 2015While the purported benefits to employers of maintaining wellness programs may be clear, uncertainty regarding the legality of such programs appears to be increasing.
An overview of Illinois’ pregnancy fairness lawsBy Justin L. LeinenweberGovernment Lawyers, April 2015As of January 1, 2015, new provisions in Illinois law establish that pregnancy, childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or child birth are now protected under the Illinois Human Rights Act.
Case note: Whitaker v. Milwaukee County, WisconsinBy David KrchakLabor and Employment Law, March 2015This opinion, decided November 25, 2014, establishes the law in the Seventh Circuit that at least for ADA discrimination claims, “joint employer” does not mean that under all circumstances two joint employers are both liable for any proven acts of discrimination under the statute.
Illinois Human Rights Commission decision summaryBy Laura D. MrukLabor and Employment Law, March 2015An update in the case of Corporate Business Cards, Ltd. v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, Illinois Department of Human Rights, and William Kosmieja.
Illinois regulates payroll cardsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, March 2015An overview of the amendments to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act.
Workplace wellness programs draw scrutiny from the EEOCBy Michael K. Chropowicz & Ronald J. PassarelliLabor and Employment Law, March 2015While the purported benefits to employers of maintaining wellness programs may be clear, uncertainty regarding the legality of such programs appears to be increasing.