Supreme Court upholds AgproBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, March 2005In the last edition of the newsletter, we featured the decision in People v. Agpro, Inc. 34 5 Ill.App. 3d 1011(First Dist. 2004) and the later legislative change to the related enforcement provisions of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. 41 Ill.CS 5/1.
Using supplemental environmental projects as settlement toolsBy Christine Picker Rothchild & Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, March 2005The scenario: Company X receives a Notice of Violation, a complaint from a government agency or a citizen's group, or even an administrative order.
CAFOs and air emissionsBy Michael C. WhiteEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, November 2004Until recently, many commercial agricultural activities in the United States have been exempt from certain requirements of federal and state environmental laws.
General Assembly legislatively overrules Ryan v. AgproBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, November 2004In January of 2004, the Appellate Court of Illinois for the Second District decided Ryan v. Agpro, Inc., 345 Ill. App. 3d 1011, 803 N.E.2d 1007, 281 Ill.Dec. 386 (2nd Dist. 2004).
Supreme Court wrap-upBy Channing J. MartinEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, November 2004(Notice to librarians: The following issues were published in Volume 34 of this newsletter during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004: August, No. 1; October, No. 2; January, No. 3; June, No. 4).
Phase II stormwater discharge permits and the Tenth AmendmentBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2004The Tenth Amendment provides that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." U.S. Const. Amend. X. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, this protection of dual sovereignty prohibits the federal government from compelling state and local governments to regulate their residents according to federal standards.
Setting a limit on environmental lawsuitsBy James D. BrusslanEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2004It is common during negotiations for the sale of industrial property for the parties to assure that the site meets environmental standards.
The confused state of the useful product defenseBy Jeffrey M. PollockEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, January 2004CERCLA section 107(a)(3) provides that a person is liable for the disposal of a hazardous substance. Specifically, any person who "arranged for disposal . . . of hazardous substances owned by such person" is covered by the broad grasp of CERCLA liability.
Environmental insurance successBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, January 2004Experienced practitioners representing industrial entities know that the comprehensive general liability ("CGL") insurance policies purchased by those entities often can be used to provide coverage for various types of environmental claims.
The use of TMDLs to regulate nonpoint sources of water pollutionBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, January 2004A nonpoint source of water pollution is generally understood to be pollution in the form of runoff from farming, ranching, forestry and land development activities.
The tide rises once again: Definition of wetlands revisitedBy James K. WestonMineral Law, December 2003A recent Virginia case, Treacy v. Newdunn Associates, analyzed once again the definition of "navigable waters" under the Clean Water Act.
Fees, fees and more fees: The price of permits has just gotten pricierBy Claire A. ManningEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, August 2003In an attempt to resolve the state's current budget crisis, the Governor and Illinois' 93rd General Assembly passed whopping fee increases, many of them on environmental fees and permits, substantially increasing the cost of doing business in this state.
Legislative update: Environmental legislation from the 93rd General AssemblyBy Claire A. Manning & Kevin B. HynesEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, August 2003While the 93rd General Assembly was plagued with perhaps the most significant budget crisis in Illinois' history, it nonetheless found time to pass several serious pieces of environmental legislation, amending the Environmental Protection Act both procedurally and substantively.
Recent Clean Air Act developmentsBy Eric E. BoydEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2003After two and a half years of litigation, the U.S. EPA recently issued Guidance on the Definition of Federally Permitted Releases for Certain Air Emissions.
Superfund liability changesBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2003Last year saw a major revision of the federal Superfund Program with several important changes in the liability standards. Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, P.L. 107 118 (2002).
The Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) revised ruleBy Michael R. BermanEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2003On December 16, 2002, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) announced a final rule that will require all large Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) to obtain permits that will ensure they protect America's waters from wastewater and manure.
LUST in the LegislatureBy Kyle RomingerEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2003Among the legislation signed into law in 2002 were two Public Acts amending the Illinois Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Program.
The pros & cons of environmental auditingBy David B. WilcoxenEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2003Do you counsel a large company or public organization that maintains numerous facilities engaged in a variety of industrial, commercial, and research operations?
U.S. EPA underground storage tank program: The new millenium, MTBE, and the futureBy Thomas J. KenneyEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2003When Congress amended the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)2 in 1984, it created the statutory authority for the federal regulation of underground storage tanks (USTs).
City of Springfield v. Hashman: 4th District says close enough is good enoughBy Gene Schmittgens & Anna Chesser SmithEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2002In City of Springfield v. Hashman, 774 N.E.2d 427, 266 Ill.Dec. 321 (July 29, 2002), the appellate court for the Fourth District enjoined the development of a 22.408-acre parcel of land located outside the limits of the City of Springfield but within 200 feet of Lake Springfield, the primary water supply of the City and Sangamon County.
Clerk’s Office On-Line: Illinois Pollution Control Board’s “COOL”By Claire A. Manning & Richard R. McGillEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2002Ever since its introduction at the Illinois Pollution Control Board's 25th anniversary in Chicago in 1995, the Board's Web site has become a widely-used resource.
Enviro-Science e-Print Service offers help in environmental researchEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2002The Enviro-Science e-Print Service is a multi-agency project of DOE's Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP), the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, content partners, and sponsors.