Special use zoning and comprehensive plansBy Terrence M. MadsenGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, September 2001The Illinois Supreme Court has issued an important reminder to municipalities concerning the need for following through on comprehensive plans with appropriate zoning modifications in the opinion in City of Chicago Heights v. Living Word Outreach Full Gospel Church and Ministries, Inc., No. 87101, (March 22, 2001).
Taxes for the general practitionerBy Thomas F. HartzellGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, September 2001Every member of our firm does income taxes and three members do Federal and State of Illinois estate tax returns.
Chairman’s cornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2001As my term as Chairman of General Practice, Solo & Small Firm Section Council ends, I would like to acknowledge and thank a few people on the council for their outstanding contributions during the past year.
Computer update—Windows 95 retired by MicrosoftBy John T. PhippsGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2001Microsoft Corporation announced in February that it was retiring Windows 95.
Disclose your opinion witness even when your opponent doesn’t askBy Babette L. BrennanGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2001Opinion witnesses and what information has to be disclosed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213(g) is the bane of every trial attorneys existence.
Editor’s columnGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2001Recently, John and I attended the 7th Annual Newsletter Editors Conference in Chicago.
Practice tip: preparation of client for deposition—patient beware! Part IBy David K. HarrisGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2001In Wilson v. Devonshire Realty of Danville, 241 Ill. Dec. 129, 718 N.E. 2d 700 (Ill. App. 4th Dist. 1999), the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment was granted and affirmed.
Chairperson’s cornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001In addition, this summer under the assistance of editor Tim Duggan, the General Practice Section Council is updating the Illinois Client Interview forms.
Editor’s columnGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001This newsletter is the seventh one published this bar year. Thank you to each of the members of the General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Section Council.
Insurance coverages for business clientsBy Patrick F. ClearyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001When defending a business client it is imperative to ascertain if insurance coverage exists.
Minimum coverage to maximum for bad faith dealings by insurerBy David SpagatGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001How often have you been rebuffed or ignored in dealing with a carrier, sometimes even the "better" ones, when you have a seriously injured client in a liability situation seeking the policy limits on a limited coverage policy?
Prevent office theftBy Patrick F. ClearyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001Recent news articles document the problem of law office employees stealing money. Checks get kited, unauthorized charges are made on credit cards, and/or estates are plundered by legal assistants.
Real estate contracts:By Patrick F. ClearyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, April 2001What happens when a Buyer signs a real estate contract and then bounces the earnest money check?
Chairperson’s cornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2001At the ISBA Annual Meeting in June, 2001, the ISBA Trusts and Estates Section Council is proposing for an Estate Planning, Trust and Probate certification program for Illinois attorneys.
Editor’s columnGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2001It is time once again for the annual ABA Techshow on March 15 - 17, 2001 at Sheraton Chicago Hotel & Towers, Chicago, Illinois. At the Techshow this year there will be over 75 exciting education sessions and more than 160 exhibition booths.
Foreclosure defensesBy James E. BuchmillerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2001Sometimes there is an inclination to assume that if the basic note and mortgage are properly executed that there is no real defense to a real estate foreclosure.
Recent legislative developmentsBy Michele M. JochnerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2001Significant changes in Illinois law have occurred as a result of new legislation which became effective January 1, 2001.
“We have met the enemy and he is … us”By Matt MaloneyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2001My erstwhile friends in the legal community know that I regularly read the advance sheets.
Chairperson’s cornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2001The General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Section Council sponsors numerous seminars to assist ISBA members with their continuing legal education.
Computer update: Intel Pentium IV chip may actually run slower than Pentium III chipBy John T. PhippsGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2001The reviews indicate that while the state of the art Pentium IV Chips indicate they have faster clock speeds than the Pentium III chips, the Pentium IV may be actually run slower then the Pentium III.
Editor’s columnGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2001Now that 2000 has ended and 2001 has arrived there is no question that we have entered new millennium.
Practice alert: voluntary non-suits—criteria and consequencesBy G. Bradley HantlaGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2001The Code of Civil Procedure allows for the filing of a voluntary non-suit pursuant to Chapter 735 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, section 5/2-1009.
Chairperson’s cornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, December 2000Probably the most important project that the General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Section Council has been working on this year is the work on the proposal for changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct allowing the sale of a law firm by sole practitioners.
“Mortgagee in possession”—watch your languageBy Thomas F. HartzellGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, December 2000Prepared forms do not always have necessary language. A recent case in our circuit concerning a mortgagee asking the court to be placed in possession during foreclosure proceedings reminds all of us of the need to read documents very carefully.