EU jurisdiction: Law applicable to disputes arising from commercial agency agreementsBy Claire PerezIntellectual Property, February 2014The Court of Justice of the European Union (17Oct2013) ruled on the question of the law applicable to international commercial agency contracts, specifically, whether the governing law elected by the parties to a commercial agency contract can be disregarded in favor of the law of the forum.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Seventh Circuit questions usefulness of trademark surveysBy Eric R. WaltmireIntellectual Property, February 2014Defendant, restaurant operator planned to expand its restaurant sales to food products in grocery stores under its CRACKER BARREL & Design logo. Kraft, maker of CRACKER BARREL cheese, won an injunction, affirmed by the Seventh Circuit, which questioned consumer survey utility in trademark disputes.
Surveys, science & skepticismBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Expert witnesses are used in diverse areas of the law, including intellectual property, and are typically paid for their work, as attorneys commonly are. A skilled expert may find consistent employment helping fact finders understand the evidence and implied facts.
The dangers corporations face with assignments of intent-to-use trademark applicationsBy Robert A. CohenCorporate Law Departments, December 2013The Lanham Act has very strict rules concerning the assignment of intent-to-use trademark applications. A recent precedential TTAB decision confirms that these rules apply to assignments between independent companies, as well as parent-subsidiary families.
Breaches of privacy and data—New risks, new insuranceBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013The Internet makes everything much easier, including breaches of privacy and data. Federal and state laws now create employer and data-custodian liability for such breaches. An information audit is suggested. Insurance targeted for these liabilities is now available.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013Brief summaries or comments on interesting or important IP developments.
Torrent Wars: Copyright trolls, legitimate IP rights, and the need for new rules vetting evidence and to amend the Copyright ActBy Jeffrey J. AntonelliIntellectual Property, October 2013The problems caused by the current wave of BitTorrent copyright litigation flooding the federal courts is a classic case of the law needing to catch up to the current state of technology. In the article Torrent Wars the writer describes the Litigation abuses need to be curbed to avoid the continued burdening of innocent individuals and families becoming defendants to federal copyright litigation. Amendments to the Copyright Act are suggested to minimize the cap on statutory damages to $5,000 for consumers who infringe without a monetary purpose, rather than $150,000, as well as to screen complaints based on the Maryland District Court’s special Master process.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board not flip about the birdBy Steven L. Baron & Natalie A. HarrisIntellectual Property, October 2013The Lanham Act forbids registration of "immoral" and "scandalous" trademarks. Some decisions appear arbitrary. Luxuria's beverage bottle with raised middle finger was refused registration.
How to stop a competitor from getting a patentBy Eric R. WaltmireIntellectual Property, June 2013A review of the options to consider in light of a known or suspected pending patent application.
Joint CLE in Colorado?Intellectual Property, June 2013If a CLE session in Boulder, CO in 2014 sounds appealing, make sure your voice is heard!
Seventh Circuit addresses trademark confusion in movie titleBy Steve Mandell, Steven L. Baron, & Elizabeth MorrisIntellectual Property, June 2013The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a Northern District of Illinois court’s dismissal of a trademark case where a movie title allegedly infringed upon the name of a musical group.
Insurance coverage for IP-related business claimsBy Dale R. KurthCorporate Law Departments, May 2013It is important to have some understanding of what is covered, what is not, and what the basics of making an insurance claim are.
Joint CLE in Colorado?Intellectual Property, May 2013If a CLE session in Boulder, CO in 2014 sounds appealing, make sure your voice is heard!
IP USA Federal Date AnswersBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2013The answers to the questions posed in the second article of this issue.
IP USA federal date quizBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2013Can you name the intellectual property events associated with these events?
Plaintiff’s covenant moots counterclaim of trademark invalidityBy Eric R. WaltmireIntellectual Property, March 2013Already LLC v. Nike Inc., deals with whether a plaintiff trademark holder can easily moot a case when a defendant challenges the validity of the trademark and what impact the mooting will have on the plaintiff’s trademark rights.
Intellectual property: Do you own it and consequences of not owning itBy David H. LevittBusiness and Securities Law, February 2013In patent law, the owner of the work is the inventor. In copyright law, the person who fixes the expression in a tangible medium is the creator of the work—and the owner of the copyright.
An examination of software patents: Under Secretary of Commerce for IP & Director of the USPTO David Kappos’ November 20, 2012 Center for American Progress keynote addressBy David KapposIntellectual Property, December 2012PTO Director David Kappos discusses how intellectual property (IP) is a key driver of economic growth, exports, and job creation, the global currency for creating value. Software patents, like all patents, are a form of innovation currency and ecosystem enablers. Those who invest in breakthrough innovation deserve respect for their IP. Usually key players agree to pro-consumer solutions via licenses or joint development. Patents are enshrined in the Constitution, one of the few, if not only, clauses giving Congress the right to create personal property.
Fifty shades of counsel: Fan fiction in 2012By Shannon A.R. BondIntellectual Property, December 2012Fan fiction—sincere flattery or copyright infringement. Stephanie Meyer's Master of the Universe, E.L. James, Fifty Shades of Grey, and avoiding trouble.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2012Eclectic snippets from recent events. PTO warns of insolicitous solicitations; INTA launches teen ed UnrealCampaign.com; ND CA issues ESI Guidelines; FTC recommends truth telling; Academia IP; Ars Gratia Artis; EU; etc.
T-T-A-BBy John L. WelchIntellectual Property, December 2012TTAB writes VILLAGE PEOPLE (singers of famed Y-M-C-A aerobic song) not generic; John Welch sings T-T-A-B.
The truth, nothing but the truth—And the threat to the First AmendmentBy Steven HelleIntellectual Property, December 2012Plaintiffs plead for regulation of truthful speech plucked from the Internet's powerful potential for privacy invasion. Nieman v. Versuslaw; Martin v. Hearst Corp.
Contract litigation expense insuranceBy Kenneth T. TegliaIntellectual Property, September 2012Contract Litigation Insurance (CLI) allows individuals and businesses to insure a significant portion of the financial risk —having to pay the winners’ attorneys’ fees—that arises concomitantly with the initiation of contract dispute litigation. Plaintiffs and defendants can apply, even after the complaint is filed. Simpler than most other insurance, there is no complicated claims adjustment or issues interpreting coverage or exclusionary language—the court's official ruling activates policy coverage.