Could summary jury trials provide a lower-cost litigation alternative?
By Patrick J. Arnold, Jr.
Federal Civil Practice,
March 2011
A summary jury trial is nonbinding and is intended to be a flexible process. An abbreviated procedure is used, whereby the advisory jury may hear only lawyers' arguments, or may also hear some testimony from witnesses for both sides.
Practical jury trial tips to improve your litigation practice
By Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.
Bench and Bar,
February 2010
Jury trials come in all shapes and sizes. Since the players, facts and awards differ, attorneys must approach each case anew. Never assume you can “wing it” because you have over 20 years of experience in the courtroom, or a partner told you not to worry about it. Too many cases are won or lost because of an attorney’s lack of preparation, or worse, lack of knowledge about the law.
A question of right? Jury trials in garnishment proceedings
By Crystal Correa
Bench and Bar,
September 2009
Garnishment orders are normally served on banks, insurance companies and other third parties that might hold assets for a judgment debtor. On occasion, third party garnishees, when filing an answer to interrogatories, also file a jury demand. But are parties entitled to a jury trial during garnishment proceedings?
Select a Different Subject