Why judges should embrace limited scope representation
By Hon. Michael B. Hyman
Bench and Bar,
April 2014
Judges owe it to themselves—and the litigants and counsel appearing before them—to fully understand and follow the rules which the Supreme Court established principally as a response to the growing needs of self-represented parties.
Unbundling family law
By Lisa M. Nyuli
Family Law,
September 2013
Limited scope representation is sure to be with us as the practice of law continues to change. Family law practitioners need to be proactive in defining what that means for us, and for our clients, so that we can provide high quality services to our clients, regardless of the task.
Editor’s column: Are we missing opportunities?
By John T. Phipps
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
January 2013
As we start the new year it is a good time to take a fresh look at how we screen our cases and what we do when we hear “I need your help but I have no money.”
Unbundling, or unraveling?
By Dan Breen
Law Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on,
June 2012
What is unbundling? The short, and rough answer is that unbundling is a la carte legal services, where a lawyer might provide a few frames of a client’s legal picture, as needed or requested, but that lawyer will not be directing the whole movie.
Limited-scope legal representation—Unbunding legal services
By Michael K. Goldberg
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
December 2010
There are many issues that need to be worked out in order for the unbundling of legal services to be workable. Weigh in, and have your opinion on the subject heard.
Select a Different Subject