Dealing with pro se litigants: A judge’s dilemma
By Raymond J. McKoski
Bench and Bar,
January 2018
Canon 3(A)(4) of the Illinois judicial code permits judges to “make reasonable efforts, consistent with the law and court rules, to facilitate the ability of self-represented litigants to be fairly heard.” Does this provision help Illinois judges decide whether to intervene in a proceeding in which only one party has an attorney?
The risks of using legal forms without attorney guidance… Episode # 37
By Michael J. Maslanka
Real Estate Law,
April 2017
If your clients ever ask if they can just prepare a form, you can honestly say that they can but that they do so at their own risk, and the cost of an attorney's fee to prepare the form for her or him is likely going to be a lot less than the fee for fixing a mistake that the do-it-yourself form may produce.
The Pro Se Litigant: Small Claim Pro Se Court
By Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.
Bench and Bar,
September 2012
The Circuit Court’s Small Claims Pro Se Division serves the dual process of providing meaningful access to self-represented litigants, while also promoting judicial economy.
Adjudication of the rights of pro se litigants
By Judge Alexander P. White
Bench and Bar,
July 2006
Three recent articles and a recent case have raised the issue of the role judges should undertake in the adjudication of the rights of pro se or self represented litigants.
Dealing with pro se litigants
By Hon. Barbara Crowder
Bench and Bar,
November 2005
“Well, Judge, I guess I did not answer the discovery/bring my witnesses/prepare the case for today’s trial.
Negotiating with pro se litigant
By Robert E. Wells
Alternative Dispute Resolution,
June 2002
There is nothing most attorneys dread more than the pro se litigant. Not only is everything personal, but an attorney is required to forcefully advocate for his/her client, while meeting his/her ethical duty to the profession and his/her responsibility to the court
Select a Different Subject