No duty to preserve evidence in negligent spoliation case
By Hon. Russell W. Hartigan & Christina Faklis
Civil Practice and Procedure,
January 2013
A discussion of the Illinois Supreme Court’s reasoning and impact of the recent case of Martin v. Keeley & Sons, Inc., where the Court held that the defendants had no duty to preserve the physical evidence, a concrete I-beam that fell and injured several employees during a bridge collapse.
Sanctions and spoliation
By Hon. Barbara Crowder
Civil Practice and Procedure,
August 2011
Knowing the potential and most frequently used sanctions may assist counsel in evaluating what steps to take when faced with the loss or destruction of evidence.
Spoliation after Dardeen … back to Boyd
By Albert E. Durkin & Tressa A. Pankovits
Tort Law,
March 2005
The existence or nonexistence of a duty imposed upon parties to preserve evidence pertinent to civil actions has been hotly debated in the Illinois courts for more than a century.
Negligent spoliation of evidence
By Gina M. Arquilla
Young Lawyers Division,
December 2003
Under Illinois law, the supreme court has declined to recognize a separate cause of action for spoliation of evidence.
Select a Different Subject