The Second District avoids causing new ripples in the common law “test the waters” doctrine
By Edward Casmere & Kaitlin Klamann
Bench and Bar,
September 2016
While the Illinois appellate courts continue to disagree as to whether the “test the waters” doctrine may serve as a basis for denying a motion for substitution of judge, both the Supreme Court and the Second District have signaled that, when considering a Section 2-1001 motion, trial court judges should consider whether the circumstances indicate that a party is seeking to gain a tactical advantage through gamesmanship and judge-shopping.
Substitution of judge as of right is in need of a time restriction
By Robert I. Berger & Jin Yan
Civil Practice and Procedure,
September 2015
A party’s statutory right to a substitution of judge without the need to allege cause is a unique privilege. To prevent abuse of this privilege, the authors argue the statute should be amended to impose time limitations on exercising the right.
SOJ when court discloses opinion on related issue
By Jewel N. Klein
Bench and Bar,
June 2013
The right to seek another opinion when the lawyer believes that the judge may rule adversely should remain absolute and it should not make any difference whether that belief is obtained from a colleague, the internet, the newspaper, or directly from the judge.
SOJ when court discloses opinion on related issue
By Jewel N. Klein
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
April 2013
The right to seek another opinion when the lawyer believes that the judge may rule adversely should remain absolute and it should not make any difference whether that belief is obtained from a colleague, the internet, the newspaper, or directly from the judge.
Substitution of Judge: Recent case law
By Susan M. Brazas
Bench and Bar,
February 2007
The Illinois Code of Civil Procedure provides direction on the procedures to request a substitution of judge.
Substitution of Judge: Recent case law
By Susan M. Brazas
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
October 2006
The Illinois Code of Civil Procedure provides direction on the procedures to request a substitution of judge.
How void is void?
By Daniel B. Shanes
Bench and Bar,
December 2005
The Appellate Court recently held that in multiple-plaintiff cases, each plaintiff enjoys one substitution-of-judge motion as a matter of right, but those plaintiffs that choose not to join in the substitution-of-judge motion later lack standing to object to that motion’s disposition.
Substitution of judge-Second supplemental update
By Thomas F. Hartzell
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
February 2005
The case, In re: Estate of Helen Jean Gay v. Carolyn Hetrick, cites several other cases from Illinois concerning substitution of Judge and substantive rulings. It is a good reference guide.
Substitution of judge—supplemental update
By Thomas F. Hartzell
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
May 2002
In the January, 2002, issue of the General Practice Solo and Small Firm newsletter, I wrote an article concerning substitution of Judge.
Touchy, touchy—substitution of judge
By Thomas F. Hartzell
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
January 2002
In many of the smaller counties there may be only one circuit judge who the attorneys appear before almost every time they have court business.
Select a Different Subject