District court rules for broker on cargo claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2003In Chubb Group v. H.A. Transp. Systems, Inc., Case No. VC 01-9192 AHM (MEX) (10/9/02), the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment to defendant transportation broker H.A.
Illinois Department of Insurance “opt out” ruling a clarification for Illinois motor carriersBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2003The Illinois Appellate Court for the 1st District clobbered the Illinois trucking industry in 1997 when it ruled that workers' compensation insurers could collect premiums from motor carriers based on revenues the motor carriers paid to independent contractor owner-operators who were ineligible for workers' compensation benefits under Illinois law in Wausau Insurance Co. v. Kim's Trucking, Inc., 289 Ill. App. 3d 201, 682 N.E. 2d 190 (1st Dist. 1997) appl. denied 175 Ill. 2d 555 (1997)
Cargo damage judgment affirmed as to liability, but reversed as to damagesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003The Illinois Appellate Court for the Second District has affirmed in part and reversed in part a summary judgment awarded to an insurer against a motor carrier in a subrogation suit arising out of a cargo damage claim to an electron microscope in Wausau Ins. Co. v. All Chicagoland Moving And Storage Company, Case No. 02-01-1317 (decided September 27, 2002).
Conversion claim preempted by CarmackBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003In Chen v. Mayflower Transit, Inc., 2002 Fed. Carr Cases &84,251 (7/19/02), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois confronted several state law claims which arose on a household goods move from Atlanta to Chicago.
District court applies state law to resolve stolen international shipment issueBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 2003In Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Hanjin Shipping Co., 2002 Fed. Car. Cases &84, 249 (Sept. 2002), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois wrestled with the complicated issues of what law to apply in a dispute about the failed delivery of a Black & Decker power tool shipment from Shenzhen, China to Lowe's Company in North Vernon, IN.
Surface Transportation Board exempts non-carrier acquisition of railroad propertyEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, August 2002Surface Transportation Board (Board) Chairman Linda J. Morgan announced on May 22, 2002 that the Board has issued a decision granting the Utah Transit Authority's (UTA) motion to dismiss, as unnecessary, UTA's verified notice of exemption from Board regulation to acquire almost 63 miles of the Union Pacific Railroad Company's (UP) railroad right-of-way and certain related improvements located in Davis, Webster, Salt Lake and Utah Counties, Utah.
District court enforces cargo damage liability limitationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2002The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee has issued an important decision concerning cargo loss and damage liability limitation in EFS National Bank v. Averitt Express, Inc., 164 F. Supp. 2d 994 (8/31/01).
District court rejects broker liability in Carmack suitBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2002The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland has rejected a shipper's Carmack Amendment cargo loss and damage claim against a broker in Professional Communications, Inc. ("PCI") v. Contract Freighters, Inc., 171 F.Supp. 2d 546 (D.MD 10/17/01)
Transportation law significance of negligent hiring claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2000The Illinois Appellate Court's recent decision on the issue of negligent hiring in Strickland v. Communications & Cable of Chicago, 304 Ill. App. 3d 679, 710 N.E. 2d 55 (First Dist., 1999) is an important decision not only for purposes of employment law, but also for purposes of transportation law for the reasons detailed below.
Transportation law updatesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 1999The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that employers are bound by the terms and provisions of their employment policies and are barred from making unilateral changes to existing employee rights established by those policies.
Recent news releasesEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 1999Surface Transportation Board (board) Chairman Linda J. Morgan announced today that, to date, 22 written decisions have been issued by the board in the "Conrail" railroad control proceeding following the board's July 1998 approval of the application of CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc. (collectively, CSX) and Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company (collectively, NS) to acquire control of Conrail Inc. and Consolidated Rail Corporation (collectively, Conrail) and to divide Conrail's assets between them.
Transportation law updateBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 1999In the update for this issue, we will again address recent rulings and decisions which impact on our transportation clients generally.