Section Newsletters

Articles on Workers’ Compensation Law

Can an early retirement package prior to the attainment of MMI affect your entitlement to temporary total disability benefits and permanent total disability? A case study of: Sharwarko v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, 2015 IL App (1st) 131 By Joseph K. Guyette Workers’ Compensation Law, June 2015 Ultimately, this case will help define when a petitioner has voluntarily retired, and when the refusal to accept a job offer will result in the termination of temporary total disability benefits.
Does the IWCC have jurisdiction to assess penalties for failure to make payment of benefits once a settlement contract is final? By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, June 2015 A look at Loyola University of Chicago v. The Illinois Worker’s Compensation Commission.
Editor’s notes By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, June 2015 Editor Rich Hannigan offers the latest in IWCC news.
A race to the bottom and your practice may hang in the balance: Springfield 2015 By Richard D. Hannigan & Patrick D. Czuprynski Workers’ Compensation Law, June 2015 A discussion of the legislation currently moving through the Illinois General Assembly that would impact workers' compensation law.
Analysis of Village of Deerfield v. Illinois Workers Compensation Commission, 2014 Ill. App (2d) 131202WC (2014) By Stephen G. Baime Workers’ Compensation Law, April 2015 If one sustains two injuries on two separate dates to two different parts of the body and consolidates the claims for trial, he can collect a percentage of a person on one and a wage differential on the second one even if the part of the body in the second case could have resulted in a person as a whole award.
Circuit court has jurisdiction to resolve disputes involving attorney referral agreements By Shuaib Ahmed Workers’ Compensation Law, April 2015 In Ferris, Thompson and Zweig, Ltd. v. Esposito, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Legislature intended to divest the Circuit Court jurisdiction and confer original jurisdiction on the Commission to resolve a dispute based on a referral agreement apportioning attorney fees earned in a claim filed under the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Interview with Arbitrator Joann Fratianni By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, April 2015 This interview, originally conducted in August of 2009, is still relevant today.
A quick snapshot of the 2014 appellate court decisions By Deborah Benzing Workers’ Compensation Law, April 2015 Summaries of cases decided last year.
Calculation of AWW By Lindsey Beukema Workers’ Compensation Law, February 2015 In R & D Thiel, A Division of Carpenter Contractors of America v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, the Court issued a Rule 23 Order addressing the calculation of average weekly wage using the second method of Section 10.
Constructive selection doctrine used to overcome two physician rule By Brittany N. Meeker Workers’ Compensation Law, February 2015 A summary of Bob Red Remodeling, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission and Zenon Lemanski.
Does the Commission have jurisdiction to approve settlements in two out of three consolidated claims? By Lawrence A. Scordino Workers’ Compensation Law, February 2015 The strange little case of The Levy Company v. IWCC and Jorge Merlos arose when the claimant, Jorge Merlos filed two claims, for alleged 2003 and 2005 shoulder injuries. While those claims were pending, he returned to work with restrictions in 2007.
Employer’s due process rights were not violated by admission of treating physician’s medical opinions pursuant to Section 16 of the Act By Catherine Krenz Doan Workers’ Compensation Law, February 2015 In RG Construction Services v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, the issue before the appellate court was whether Employer was denied its due process right to cross-examine witnesses or present rebuttal evidence of the opinions of Claimant’s treating physicians that were contained in the medical records.
PPG Industries: When are job duties irrelevant? By Joseph K. Guyette Workers’ Compensation Law, February 2015 In PPG Industries v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, the Respondent argued that evidence of the Petitioner’s job duties should be considered irrelevant when that evidence is over three years old. While the appellate court rejected that argument, it left open the possibility that older evidence of a Petitioner’s work duties may be admissible at trial.
Can a petitioner waive the right to a Section 8(d)(2) wage differential absent a request by petitioner for a specific loss PPD award in lieu of a wage differential award? Or, is an “impressive suntan” a valid basis for the denial of permanent total disabi By Michelle D. Porro Workers’ Compensation Law, October 2014 A look at Section 8(d)2, waiver, and the right to receive benefits under Section 8(d)1.
Enough of the “gotcha”—It is time for limited discovery/disclosure under the WC Act By Christine M. Ory Workers’ Compensation Law, October 2014 The rationale for not allowing discovery in workers’ compensation cases was to expedite the arbitration process. However, the lack of discovery seems to have had the opposite effect
Exclusive remedy doctrine does not apply when employee first learns of injury after the expiration of the statute of repose under the Workers’ Compensation Act and Occupational Disease Act By Anita M. DeCarlo Workers’ Compensation Law, October 2014 A discussion of the June 27, 2014 decision from the Illinois Appellate Court First District in Folta v. Ferro Engineering.
1 comment (Most recent October 12, 2014)
Is the employer liable for payment of temporary total disability benefits when the employee is terminated while on light-duty restriction for admittedly stealing cigarettes? By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, October 2014 A discussion of the much-anticipated decision of Walter Matuszczak v. IWCC, which was handed down by The Appellate Court on September 30th 2014.
1 comment (Most recent October 12, 2014)
Case summary for Compass Group v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, 2014 IL App. 2d 121283WC, rehearing denied 5/13/14 By Patrick D. Czuprynski Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 A detailed look at this recent case.
Claim for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease not allowed when employee timely filed claim within the statute of limitations for coal miners pneumoconiosis but not chronic obstructive pulmonary disease By Kenneth F. Werts Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 Those who are filing claims for occupational disease involving ventilatory impairment due to coal dust exposure should file their claims within three years of the date of disablement to be certain that the claim is timely filed.
Don Young v. Doncasters d/b/a MECO, Inc., 2014 IL App (4th) 130392WC By Matt Belcher Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 After a hearing, an Arbitrator at the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission concluded that Mr. Young’s injury was not a compensable work accident. That decision was subsequently confirmed by the Commission with a dissent by Commissioner Tyrrell. The Appellate Court unanimously reversed the Commission and awarded benefits.
A historical view of the Workers’ Compensation Act By Kenneth F. Werts & Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 The first in a two-part series looking at the evolution of Illinois' workers' compensation system.
An interview with Arbitrator George Andros By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 Learn more about the life and background of this dynamic Arbitrator.
Mark Tolbert v. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission et al. (Prairie Central Cooperative, Appellee), 2014 IL App (4th) 130523WC By Sean J. Mussey Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 The Appellate Court for the Fourth District found notice for an inhalation injury under a plain reading of 6(a) of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, but stated notice could have been accomplished under a “manifestation date” analysis often used in repetitive stress cases where the exact date of injury is impossible to determine.
Observations from the bench By Joanne M. Fratianni Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 Some tips from Arbitrator Joanne Fratianni.
Special risks or hazards can become part of the employment and render the risk, and to the general public compensable By Richard D. Hannigan Workers’ Compensation Law, July 2014 A summary of Brais v. IWCC.
Evaluating permanent partial disability in the wake of Section 8.1(b)—Has anything changed? By Shuaib Ahmed Workers’ Compensation Law, May 2014 A synopsis of the reported decisions analyzing the five factors of permanent partial disability under Section 8.1b, broken down by each factor.
Fall on stairs found compensable despite being caused by pre-existing condition By Mark P. Matranga Workers’ Compensation Law, May 2014 The result in Village of Villa Park v. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission et al. is in direct contradiction to the rule established in Eliot v. Industrial Commission.
Illinois employers can demand drug and alcohol testing and avoid losing a retaliatory discharge claim so long as the policy is applied in a non-discriminatory manner By Deborah A. Benzing Workers’ Compensation Law, May 2014 The Jeff Phillips v. Continental Tire The Americas, LLC decision affirms employers’ rights to drug and alcohol testing in Illinois and specifically reiterates that such testing is not against public policy.
Illinois employers can demand drug and alcohol testing and avoid losing a retaliatory discharge claim so long as the policy is applied in a non-discriminatory manner By Deborah A. Benzing Labor and Employment Law, May 2014 The Jeff Phillips v. Continental Tire The Americas, LLC decision affirms employers’ rights to drug and alcohol testing in Illinois and specifically reiterates that such testing is not against public policy.
Medical provider cannot collect balances due after fee schedule sums are paid By Asalya I. Akhmerova Workers’ Compensation Law, May 2014 In Tiburzi Chiropractic vs David Kline and Rovey Seed Company, Inc. the Appellate Court held that a medical provider cannot collect outstanding balances after sums are paid by the employer pursuant to the Illinois Medical Fee Schedule under Section 8.2 of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act.

Select a Different Subject