All the latest developments in health care lawBy W. Eugene Basanta, Andrew Roszak, & Michael SinhaHealth Care Law, June 2007A Wisconsin pharmacist, who had been fired from a retail pharmacy, brought suit alleging that his termination violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e et seq. Specifically he claimed that he had been let go due to his religious-based refusal to have any form of interaction, no matter how slight, with anyone seeking birth control.
All the latest developments in health care lawBy W. Eugene Basanta, Andrew Roszak, & Michael SinhaHealth Care Law, March 2007Medical malpractice litigation has been and continues to be rough on the litigating parties, including in particular physicians who are sued.
Alternative Minimum TaxBy Sarah Delano PavlikFederal Taxation, August 2007Everyone agrees that something must be done to fix the alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Amendment to the Illinois Human Rights Act opens the door to civil suitsBy Peter LaSorsaCorporate Law Departments, November 2007On August 13, 2007 Illinois Governor Blagojevich signed into law H.B. 1509, an amendment to the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA) which is effective on January 1, 2008.
Amendments to administrative practice: Is a central core panel a good idea?By J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, June 2007A central core panel is the heart of Illinois Senate Bill 58, introduced on January 31, 2007, by Senator Harmon, which would amend the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act and create the Office of Administrative Hearings under the jurisdiction of the Governor, at 5 ILCS 100/12-5.
Another confusing interest caseBy Mark P. MatrangaWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2007The Appellate Court, Fourth District, has ventured into the interest calculation thicket with Radosevich v. The Industrial Commission, 367 Ill.App.3d, 856 N.E.2d 1, 305 Ill.Dec. 469.
Another Health Care Power of Attorney: Mental Health Treatment Preference DeclarationBy Donna L. MooreTrusts and Estates, June 2007The Power of Attorney for Property, Power of Attorney for Health Care and Living Will are familiar Advanced Directives. The Mental Health Treatment Preference Declaration (“Declaration”) is another Advanced Directive designed to capture the mental health treatment preferences of a client.
Answers to the June issue Practical ProblemsBy Robert Duffin & Myles JacobsReal Estate Law, November 2007The June issue raised two practical problems in residential real estate transactions.
Anti-Pretexting StatuteBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, November 2007Hewlett-Packard’s Chairman, Patricia Dunn, was allegedly upset about leaks to the media about the company’s long term strategic plans. Hewlett-Packard retained an outside firm to gain access to its directors’ phone records, believing that one or more directors were the source of the leak.
The antitrust counselor: The Supreme Court reversed Dr. Miles: Now what?By Mildred L. CalhounOctober 2007The US Supreme Court recently overruled Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons, holding that all vertical price restraints are to be analyzed under the Rule of Reason. In other words, instead of being per se illegal and presumed anticompetitive, all vertical price restraints are now analyzed for reasonableness and their effect on competition.
Approaching the total client in general practiceBy Patrick E. WardGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, July 2007Each person is the composite of the many parts which force or shape that person’s behavior. While respecting the role of free will, perceptions of options often narrow the field of choices and effectively dictate action taken.
Arbitration alternativesBy Champ W. Davis, Jr.Alternative Dispute Resolution, October 2007Arbitration is a common form of dispute resolution.
Articulating the business case for inclusionBy Jane DiRenzo PigottWomen and the Law, June 2007The business case for diversity is well established and directly relates to any legal organization’s ability to compete for the best clients and talent.
Articulating the business case for inclusionBy Jane DiRenzo PigottDiversity Leadership Council, June 2007Abundant research, practical experience, and media stories support the business case for diversity. Ensuring that diversity is achieved requires committed leadership and rigorous assessment so that change is both measurable and sustainable into the future.
Attorney General issues opinionsBy Lynn PattonGovernment Lawyers, December 2007Under section 4 of the Attorney General Act (15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2006)), the Attorney General is authorized, upon request, to furnish written legal opinions to State officers and State’s Attorneys on matters relating to their official duties.
Attorney General issues opinionsBy Lynn PattonGovernment Lawyers, June 2007Under section 4 of the Attorney General Act (15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2005 Supp.)), the Attorney General is authorized, upon request, to furnish written legal opinions to State officers and State’s Attorneys on matters relating to their official duties.
Attorney General issues opinionsBy Lynn PattonGovernment Lawyers, March 2007Under section 4 of the Attorney General Act (15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2005 Supp.)), the Attorney General is authorized, upon request, to furnish written legal opinions to State officers and State’s Attorneys on matters relating to their official duties.
Attorney General Opinion restricts county recordersBy Howard SamsonReal Estate Law, June 2007In the portion of this author’s article on land split considerations dealing with the Plat Act, which appeared in the February 2007 issue of this newsletter, it was stated that the Attorney General’s office was in the process of determining “whether the provisions of 765 ILCS 205/5a are broad enough to allow a county Recorder to require” that a Plat Act affidavit accompany every submitted deed, even one wherein the legal description was an undivided lot in an existing subdivision.
Attorney independence? Remember The Alamo!By Hon. Ron SpearsBench and Bar, June 2007The right to counsel does not just extend to popular or “deserving” causes or individuals.
Attorney signature on appeal bond not sufficientBy Mark CosiminiWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2007Section 19(f) of the Act sets forth the requirements for seeking a judicial review of a Commission decision and states in part.
Attorneys from VietnamInternational and Immigration Law, March 2007A delegation from Vietnam met with the International and Immigration Law Section Council and ISBA Officers as part of a three city tour of the United States.
Bad-Faith Requirement for Fee Shifting in the Consumer Fraud Act: Krautsack v. AndersonBy Allen S. Goldberg & W. Dan LeeCivil Practice and Procedure, September 2007The Supreme Court of Illinois in Krautsack v. Anderson recently held that fee awards to a prevailing defendant under section 10a(c) of the Act should be granted “only if the trial court makes a threshold finding that the plaintiff acted in bad faith.”