Stapleton v. Moore: Cross-examination of a medical expert with a learned treatiseBy Hon. Daniel T. GillespieCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2010In Stapleton, the trial judge allowed defense counsel to cross-examine plaintiff’s expert with a medical article that was not disclosed in discovery. The appellate court affirmed.
Start spreading the newsBy Hon. Michael B. HymanBench and Bar, December 2010When it comes to properly informing the public about the courts, we in the legal arena must take the lead to find ways to cultivate, engage, and educate an indifferent, uninformed citizenry.
Status report on my paperless officeBy Alan R. PressLegal Technology, Standing Committee on, September 2010A paperless office may not be for everyone, but author Alan Press discusses how it has made his practice more efficient and more profitable.
Staying safe with GPS technologyBy Alan PearlmanLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, December 2010Being an active part of your children’s lives has always been important. Parental involvement is needed now, more than ever. Today it is possible to track a child’s activities via text messages and e-mail, as well as to monitor his or her whereabouts via GPS.
Strip club may be liable for patron’s drunk drivingBy Robert T. ParkCivil Practice and Procedure, May 2010Plaintiffs alleged that defendant’s employees removed the intoxicated decedents from its club, ordered and assisted them into their car, and sent them away knowing the driver was drunk.
Sufficiency of proof for a conviction of DUI and reliability of Field-Sobriety Tests in proving intoxicationBy J. Brick Van Der SnickTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2010In an opinion authored by Justice Steigmann, the court reviewed the evidence introduced at trial to determine whether it proved Defendant guilty of DUI beyond a reasonable doubt and also analyzed the Defendant’s claim that the field-sobriety tests were unreliable.
Summary of recent decisionsBy Edward J. SchoenbaumGovernment Lawyers, June 2010Recent decisions of interest to government lawyers.
Summary of recent decisionsBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, April 2010Recent decisions affecting Administrative Law.
Summary of recent decisionsBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, March 2010Case summaries of recent Administrative Law decisions.
Summary of recent decisionsBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, February 2010These summaries were prepared by Adrienne W. Albrecht for the ISBA Illinois E-Mail Case Digests, which are free e-mail digests of Illinois Supreme and Appellate Court cases available to members soon after the cases appear on the Internet, with a link to the full text of the slip opinion on the Illinois Reporter of Decision’s Web site. These have been downloaded and reorganized according to topic by Ed Schoenbaum for members of the Administrative Law Section, with permission.
Summary of recent decisionsBy Hon. Edward J. SchoenbaumAdministrative Law, January 2010These summaries were prepared by Adrienne W. Albrecht for the ISBA Illinois E-Mail Case Digests, which are free e-mail digests of Illinois Supreme and Appellate Court cases available to members soon after the cases appear on the Internet, with a link to the full text of the slip opinion on the Illinois Reporter of Decision’s Web site. These have been downloaded and reorganized according to topic by Ed Schoenbaum for members of the Administrative Law Section, with permission.
Summary of recent decisions and PLAsBy Hon. Edward J. Schoenbaum, William A. Price, & J.A. SebastianAdministrative Law, May 2010A listing of recently decided cases related to Administrative Law.
Supreme Court grants arbitrators more powerBy Joshua BaileyAlternative Dispute Resolution, October 2010Since Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act states that such clauses are “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable” without mentioning the validity of the agreement as a whole, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a challenge to the whole agreement must be decided by the arbitrator.
Supreme Court Rule 191By Hon. Pamela E. LozaFamily Law, April 2010Rule 191 pertains only to Motions for Summary Judgment, Motion for Involuntary dismissal based upon certain defects or defenses, and Motions to Objection of Jurisdiction Over the Person, and defines the requirements for the affidavits which must accompany the responses to those motions.
Supreme Court Rule update: “You’ve got mail”By Hon. Barbara CrowderCivil Practice and Procedure, March 2010The Illinois Supreme Court has now amended Supreme Court Rules 11, 12, 361, 267, 373, 381 and 383 in recognition of the popularity and efficiency of third-party commercial carriers. Attorneys will no longer run afoul of the rules by accidentally using a commercial carrier over the Postal Service when filing documents with courts or applying the mailbox rule to deadlines.
Supreme Court ruling leaves window open for business method patentsBy Brian R. MichalekIntellectual Property, October 2010This past June, the Supreme Court issued the much-anticipated opinion in Bilski et al. v. Kappos. The 5-4 majority opinion held the claims of the patent application at issue were directed to an abstract idea and therefore were not patentable under 35 U.S.C. Section 101.
Supreme Court shifts views on arbitrationBy Sidra HamidiAlternative Dispute Resolution, May 2010The Illinois Supreme Court will decide whether courts or arbitrators themselves would decide the enforceability of an arbitration agreement.
Surviving in the legal practiceBy Sonia Munoz GallagherYoung Lawyers Division, December 2010Six rules to help you be a better and more productive lawyer.