Biometrics and Business Re-Opening in Light of COVID-19By Lauren Caisman & Patrick DePoyCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2020While Illinois courts implement various temperature screening methods in re-opening for in-person hearings and other court services, any private entity—which includes individuals—must take particular heed of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act in looking to do the same.
Black History MonthElder Law, February 2020February celebrates Black History Month, which began as Negro History Week in 1926.
The Black Lives Matter Movement and the WorkplaceBy Corina ValderramaLabor and Employment Law, August 2020A look at what companies around the country are doing in response to the Black Lives Matter movement.
Book Review: ‘Bad Blood’By Gary T. RafoolIntellectual Property, February 2020A review of the book 'Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup' by John Carreyrou.
Boosting Wellness and Managing Stress During QuarantineBy Erin Clifford, E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., & Michael B. HymanCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, May 2020Wellness and stress management tips during COVID-19.
Bostock: The Textualism FightsBy Aaron B. MaduffFederal Civil Practice, September 2020On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court held that sexual orientation discrimination in employment is prohibited by Title VII in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc., v. Zarda.
Brexit & Intellectual PropertyBy Rachel HavardIntellectual Property, September 2020The UK has left the EU, so what lies ahead for EU trademarks and Community designs, especially from a UK perspective?
California Superior Court Enforces Federal Forum Selection Provision Under California LawBy David Kotler, Joshua D.N. Hess, & Brian C. RaphelCorporate Law Departments, October 2020A California state court recently enforced a Delaware corporation’s bylaw requiring shareholders to bring federal securities claims under the 1933 Securities Act in an appropriate federal forum, demonstrating that courts outside of Delaware will enforce such provisions.
California Voters Approve the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020By Aaron W. BrooksIntellectual Property, December 2020On November 3, 2020 California voters approved Proposition 24, causing the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 to become law when the California Secretary of State has certified the election results. The new law is a significant expansion of the already enacted California Consumer Privacy Act. While much of CPRA will not become operative until 2023, several key provisions become effective right away. Perhaps most importantly, California now has the funding and mechanics available to create the new California Privacy Protection Agency. The new agency will have the power to interpret the California Consumer Privacy Act and to enforce its requirements.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, November 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, October 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, September 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, August 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, July 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, June 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, May 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.
Call for ArticlesElder Law, April 2020Information on submitting articles for the newsletter.