Standing to childrear: 2013By Jeffrey A. ParnessOctober 2012For now, standing to childrear in Illinois will be generally limited to biological and adoptive parents. But that may change soon with increasing calls for statutory reforms and precedents recognizing that children’s best interests, as well as societal and quasi-parental interests, should not automatically yield to superior parental rights seemingly waived without any judicial oversight.
Sufficiency of tender terminating right to judgment interestBy Mark RouleauFebruary 2012The recent First District case of Poliszczuk v. Winkler, 2011 Ill. App. 1st Dist. 101847, discusses in detail what constitutes a sufficient tender of payment of judgment so as to toll the defendant’s further obligation to pay judgment interest pursuant to Illinois Code of Civil Procedure.
Supreme court clarifies fraudulent misrepresentation pleading requirementsBy Sara SiegallAugust 2012Bonhomme v. St. James serves as an important reminder that practitioners should take care to preserve adverse rulings for appeal, and that the failure to take small, simple steps may lead to big and unfortunate consequences.
Upholding the plain language reading of non-competition bargains: Citadel v. Teza Technologies LLCBy Matthew R. CarterMay 2012This article discusses the appellate court’s decision in Citadel v. Teza Technologies LLC, describes how it might be applied by employers and employees going forward, and ultimately suggests that, because of Reliable Fire Equipment Co. v. Arredondo, the Citadelopinion may have greater application than it did when the opinion was first published.
Workers’ compensation is an injured employee’s sole remedyBy Robert T. ParkSeptember 2012The recent decision in Rodriguez v. Frankie’s Beef/Pasta & Catering illustrates the use of the Workers’ Compensation Act as a defense to a negligence suit.