Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc.—A primer on piercing the corporate veilBy Charles W. MurdockNovember 2006In a case of first impression in Illinois, the Second District, in Fontana v. TLD Builders, Inc., held that a non-shareholder can be held liable when the corporate veil of a for-profit corporation is pierced.
Parent corporation liability for acts of its subsidiaryBy Charles W. MurdockJune 2006When we think of the potential liability of a parent corporation for the acts of its subsidiary, we normally think of the situation in which the corporate veil of a subsidiary is sought to be pierced in order to hold the parent liable.
Planning for business disputes and financial difficulties: Asset protection for shareholdersBy Robert C. Knuepfer & David F. RolewickJune 2006The topic of “Asset Protection” has become a “hot item” in estate and business planning literature in recent years, fueled by the failure of publicly traded companies, shareholder actions against officers and directors and S.E.C. actions against officers and directors of publicly traded companies as well as the ever present willingness of members of our society to blame others for their misfortune and to find attorneys willing to litigate the point.
Series LLCsBy Ethel SpyratosApril 2006If asset protection is important for your clients’ business, series LLCs may be an entity organization option to consider.
The Supreme Court’s decisions in Arthur Andersen and Dura PharmaceuticalsBy Ben Bartels & Charles W. MurdockJanuary 2006In Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 125 S.Ct. 2129, a unanimous Supreme Court overturned an obstruction of justice conviction for Enron’s chief auditor, Arthur Andersen.