Case comment: Nat’l Envtl. Dev. Association’s Clean Air Project v. EPABy Emily TaylorSeptember 2014This case serves as a reminder to the Headquarters and Regional Senior Air Program Officials to take care that their memoranda do not violate the CAA’s “Regional Consistency” provision and its implementing regulation.
Owner of vacant property liable for CERCLA cleanupBy Raymond T. ReottMarch 2014The recent California decision in City of Banning v. Dureau illustrates the danger faced by a property owner who does not monitor and control activities on his vacant properties.
Recent environmental decisions: Illinois casesBy Kyle P. Carlson, Alison Hayden Kekrer, & Emily N. MasalskiSeptember 2014The following Illinois case law summary presents a survey of some of the most important environmental law cases decided by Illinois state courts in the last year.
USEPA wins cross state air transport pollution caseBy Raymond T. ReottJune 2014In a 6-2 vote, the United States Supreme Court has reversed the decision of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals on an important Clean Air Act case.
What is so great about a “No Further Remediation” letter anyway?By Matthew E. CohnJanuary 2014When deciding whether to buy, sell, hold, investigate, remediate, manage, or do anything else with or to your contaminated properties, the most important things to have are good data, good science, good counsel, good motives, and a healthy understanding of your tolerance of risk.