Real Estate Law

Kuykendall v. Schneidewind

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Real Estate Contract
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (5th) 160013
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 26, 2017
District: 
5th Dist.
Division/County: 
St. Clair Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part; remanded.
Justice: 
CATES

Suit for fraud, breach of contract, and violations of Consumer Fraud Act, arising from purchase of a commercial property. Court erred in dismissing case with prejudice. The "as is" provision in purchase contract is not an affirmative matter that avoids legal effect of or defeats any claims in complaint. Many provisions in contract which delineate seller's duties and warranties must be read in conjunction with the "as is" provision. Affidavits of Defendants do not address Plaintiff's allegations of relationship that may constitute enterprise liability. Record is not yet fully developed, and discovery has not commenced on these issues. Court properly denied motion for attorney fees and sanctions, as there is not yet a "prevailing party" as provided in contract; and pleadings were not frivolous. (MOORE and CHAPMAN, concurring.)

House Bill 188

Topic: 
Objections to jurisdiction over the person

(Thapedi, D-Chicago; Raoul, D-Chicago) amends § 2-301 of the Code of Civil Procedure by changing the exception to the statute’s general rule. The general rule is that a party must object to the court’s jurisdiction (without waiving an objection to the court’s jurisdiction) over the party’s person by filing a motion to dismiss the entire proceeding or by filing a motion to quash service of process, but the party must do this before they file any other pleading.

House Bill 188’s exception to this general rule of waiver allows a motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead or a motion filed under § 2-1301, § 2-1401, and § 2-1401.1

But it requires any motion objecting to the court’s jurisdiction over the party’s person under § 2-301 must be filed within 60 days of the court’s order disposing of the initial motion filed under these three sections. A party may combine these motions without waiving their objection to jurisdiction.

House Bill 188 has passed the House and on third reading in the Senate. 

 

5510 Sheridan Road Condominium Association v. U.S. Bank

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominium Property Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 160279
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 31, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Justice: 
DELORT

(Modified upon denial of rehearing 5/5/17.) After bank acquired condo unit through foreclosure sale, Condo Association filed forcible entry and detainer action against bank for possession of unit, alleging that payments bank remitted to Association for post-sale common expenses after foreclosure sale were untimely. Section 9(g)(3) of Condominium Property Act is designed to encourage prompt payment of post-sale expenses, by setting their payment as a precondition to extinguishment of association liens for pre-sale expenses. Bank, within 16 months of judicial sale, fully paid amounts it owed for unit's post-sale common expenses, and thereby confirmed the extinguishment of Association's lien for pre-sale common expenses, and with it any entitlement to recovery possessed by Association. Thus, bank was entitled to summary judgment.(HOFFMAN and ROCHFORD, concurring).

BMW Financial Services, N.A. v. Felice

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Replevin
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 160397
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 23, 2017
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HUDSON

(Court opinion corrected 4/27/17.) Plaintiff filed replevin action for Porsche. Court properly ordered possession of Porsche awarded to Plaintiff, as later purchaser had obtained title based on previous owner’s fraudulent lien release letter. (SCHOSTOK and SPENCE, concurring.)

BMO Harris Bank National Association v. LaRosa

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 161159
Decision Date: 
Monday, April 17, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CONNORS

Defendants filed Section 2-1401 petition to vacate personal deficiency judgment entered against them in foreclosure. Court properly struck and dismissed Section 2-1401 petition as barred by Section 15-1509( c) of Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law.  Section 15-1509(c ) is clear that all claims of parties to foreclosure are barred, and it does not conflict with other statements in Foreclosure Law.  (HARRIS and MIKVA, concurring.)

From the Newsletters - Drone On

May
2017
Article
, Page 38
If a drone flies over your backyard, is it trespassing? Invading your privacy? Do you have the right to shoot it down?

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Payton

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Subrogation
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 160305
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
NEVILLE

Defendant homeowners stopped paying their mortgage and warranty deed bearing Defendants' signatures conveyed home to buyers who obtained mortgage, and some of loan proceeds were used to extinguish Defendants' mortages on property. Once buyers' lender's assignor paid off Defendants' mortgages, assignor was subrogated, by operation of law, and it stepped into the shoes of Defendants' mortgage lenders. Thus, buyers' lender acquired priority interest in subject property. Court properly granted assignor's motion for summary judgment, predicated on doctrine of equitable subrogation. (HYMAN and PIERCE, concurring.)

Senate Bill 885

Topic: 
Installment Sales Contract Act

(Koehler, D-Peoria) repeals the Dwelling Structure Contract Act and the Dwelling Unit Installment Contract Act. Creates the Installment Sales Contract Act. Adds provisions governing: definitions; terms and conditions of installment sales contracts; applicability of other Acts; sales of condemned dwelling structures; repairs; account statements; transfer of payments; insurance proceeds; unlawful acts; waivers; and penalties. Makes corresponding changes in the Condominium Property Act. Amends the Code of Civil Procedure. Provides that a real estate installment contract for residential real estate is subject to the foreclosure provisions of the Code if the purchase price is to be paid in installments over a period in excess of one year (instead of five years) and the amount unpaid under the terms of the contract at the time of the filing of the foreclosure complaint, including principal and due and unpaid interest, at the rate prior to default, is less than 90% (instead of 80%) of the original purchase price of the real estate as stated in the contract. Effective January 1, 2018. It is on third reading in the Senate. 

North Spaulding Condominium Assoc v. Cavanaugh

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominiums
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 160870
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 31, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and vacated in part; remanded.
Justice: 
PIERCE

Condo Association filed forcible entry and detainer action against condo unit owners for their failure to pay assessments.Court within its discretion in denying the Defendants’ motion for new trial where court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the Notice and Demand or the account ledger into evidence. Court properly denied Defendants' Section 2-1110 motion for judgment and motion to reconsider, Court properly awarded attorney fees expended on behalf of Condo Association, but award vacated as to amounts expended for defense of 3rd-party complaint. (NEVILLE and MASON, concurring.)

Schindler v. Watson

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Liens
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL App (2d) 160126
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 16, 2017
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
DuPage Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HUTCHINSON

Plaintiff needed to file a foreclosure complaint before the expiration of his judgment lien on real estate, if he wished to enforce his lien against property after it was conveyed to another party. A judgment debtor may lawfully convey property to a 3rd-party during life of enforceable judgment lien without notifying judgment creditor and satisfying the lien, but such conveyance does nothing to impair judgment creditor's lien rights. (HUDSON and JORGENSEN, concurring.)