ISBA Ethics Opinions on Prospective Clients

An attorney may not encourage a client to engage in the practice known as “taint shopping,” whereby a prospective client meets with an attorney for the sole purpose of disqualifying the attorney from representing an opponent. An attorney who participates in an initial consultation with a prospective client, but who is not retained by the prospective client, is not prohibited from later representing a client with materially adverse interests in the same or in a substantially related matter if: (a) before the consultation, the attorney obtained the prospective client’s informed consent of any conflict that might arise from the information disclosed by the prospective client; (b) even in the absence of an informed consent, the attorney did not receive information that could be significantly harmful if used in the matter; or (c) the attorney can establish that the prospective client revealed information to the attorney with no intention of retaining the attorney.