Our evolving notion of what is an ‘impartial jury’
By Linda J. Watson
Bench and Bar,
October 2016
In a world where the populace is becoming increasingly skeptical of governance, more-diverse juries are perceived as being more fair and impartial than those that are not.
Judges should not say “expert” in front of the jury
By Evan Bruno
Bench and Bar,
May 2016
It’s impossible to say for certain whether a judge’s oral designation of a witness as an expert has ever tipped the scales in a jury trial. But more importantly, why does the jury even need to be informed of this evidentiary ruling?
Six-person jury law found unconstitutional
By Robert T. Park
Civil Practice and Procedure,
February 2016
In Kakos v. Butler on December 21, Cook County Circuit Judge William Gomolinksi handed down an Order and Opinion that found PA 98-1132 unconstitutional because it violates the directive of the Illinois Constitution, Article I, Section 13.
A constitutional question about reduced jury size
By Robert T. Park
Civil Practice and Procedure,
January 2015
Public Act 98-1132 goes into effect June 1, 2015. Trial lawyers will be keenly interested in the Act’s change to 735 ILCS 5/2-1105(b), which provides: “All jury cases shall be tried by a jury of 6.”
Letter to the Editor
By Hon. Eugene G. Doherty
Tort Law,
December 2012
A reader's response to “Authoritative texts: Expert witnesses are allowed to read to the jury the contents of inadmissible scientific and medical literature as the basis for an opinion” which was published in the November issue of this newsletter.
Beyond the verdict III: Jurors pick parts of trial
By Hon. James Varga
Bench and Bar,
January 2012
In this third installment of the insightful series that aims to understand jurors and their thoughts, jurors in this study were asked to identify the most influential part of a jury trial. The results may come as a surprise to some.
Beyond the verdict II: Jurors evaluate
By Hon. James Varga
Bench and Bar,
October 2011
In part one of this article the author described the procedure and results of from 10 jury trials. In this second part, the author explains the significance of the results.
Beyond the verdict: Jurors speak out
By Hon. James Varga
Bench and Bar,
June 2011
In the first part of this article, the procedure and results of from 10 jury trials are described. In the second part, the significance of the results is explained.
Jury trial innovations: 7th Circuit project
By William J. Brinkmann
Federal Civil Practice,
September 2006
The Seventh Circuit Bar Association has recently completed testing throughout the Seventh Circuit District Courts of seven concepts designed to improve civil jury trials.
Jury selection: Selling your case
By James A. Hansen
Civil Practice and Procedure,
June 2006
The work of any good trial lawyer starts with selling his or her case to a prospective jury panel.
The jury system: Evolution of revolution
By Robert E. Wells, Jr.
Alternative Dispute Resolution,
April 2006
The jury system is under attack in Congress, in the Illinois Legislature, and in the press. Much of the criticism focuses on the perception of “run-away jury verdicts.”
What do you do if the jury asks about insurance?
By G. Bradley Hantla
General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm,
December 2002
Assume the following factual situation: You have just completed a trial, and the case has been submitted to the jury.
Select a Different Subject