Illinois Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 4 in Latest Disciplinary Filing
The Illinois Supreme Court announced the filing of lawyer disciplinary orders on May 16, 2023. Sanctions were imposed because the lawyers engaged in professional misconduct by violating state ethics law.
Disbarred
Bennet Berliner, Chicago
Mr. Berliner, who was licensed in 2005, was disbarred. He misappropriated more than $198,000 in escrow funds from five clients and used the money for his own purposes or to replace funds he took from other clients. He also made false statements to the ARDC and subsequently refused to cooperate with the ARDC’s investigation.
Helga Kahr, Seattle, Washington
Ms. Kahr, who was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1974, was disbarred after having been convicted of two counts of theft in the state of Washington and sentenced to 18 months in prison. She misappropriated more than $280,000 from a disabled person while serving as his guardian.
Michael Allen Lancaster, Sterling
Mr. Lancaster, who was licensed in 1981, was disbarred. He was convicted of battery for making physical and sexual contact with a female client while she was in his law office.
Suspended
George Louis Acosta, St. Charles
Mr. Acosta, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for one year. He misappropriated $86,912 of client funds to his own benefit, including $39,000 that a court had ordered him to safeguard for a client who was a minor. The suspension is effective on June 6, 2023.
Tara Marie Grimm, South Elgin
Ms. Grimm, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. While working for a transportation company, she failed to diligently handle a matter and made false statements to her manager about her purported work on four matters. While later working for a law firm, she made false statements to the firm about her work and used the firm’s credit card without authority for personal purchases totaling almost $2,000. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board.
Matthew Eric Peek, Champaign
Mr. Peek, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until he makes restitution or provides proof of a settlement with his former clients and consistent compliance with the terms of any such settlement. In two matters, he failed to act with reasonable diligence and did not communicate with his clients. He also failed to promptly deliver 13 garnishment checks owed to a client or respond to the client’s inquiries about the checks. Finally, he made gratuitous comments of a sexual nature to opposing counsel and a paralegal in a domestic relations matter. The suspension is effective on June 6, 2023.
Raed A. Shalabi, Orland Park
Mr. Shalabi, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for 60 days and required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the Court’s order of discipline. He entered into a business transaction with clients without obtaining the clients’ informed consent and without advising them to seek independent counsel. He also filed pleadings for a client in a federal court where he was not licensed to practice and then, before refunding fees, had the client sign a document agreeing not to file a disciplinary complaint against him. The suspension is effective on June 6, 2023.
Reprimanded
Sean Christopher Ziadeh, Farmington, Michigan
Mr. Ziadeh was licensed in Michigan in 2002 and in Illinois in 2005. A Michigan Attorney Discipline Board reprimanded him for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and reprimanded him.
Censured
James P. Ginzkey, Bloomington
Mr. Ginzkey, who was licensed in 1979, was censured. In the course of representing a client in a medical malpractice matter, he knowingly provided privileged documents to an expert witness in violation of a court order.
Kevin Patrick Wendorf, Glen Ellyn
Mr. Wendorf, who was licensed in 2005, was censured. He was found guilty of one count of battery based on his groping a woman who came to his law office to discuss a criminal case in which he was representing her.
Member Comments (7)
is censure a sufficient discipline for battery a client in a sexual manner?? I think not.
Agree Gary.
are these attorneys censored or censured? probably the latter.
It is not enough to censure this attorney for sexually battering a client. At minimum it should an indefinite suspension with conditions, like a substance abuse and/or psychological evaluation and to follow any treatment recommendations, for those conditions to be met, and a requirement that he'd have to apply for reinstatement.
I agree that groping a client warrants more than a censure. This is disappointing to read.
It's interesting that a sexual relationship between an attorney and client violates Rule 1.8 - Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules, even if the relationship was consented to by the client. The only exception is if they were already in a sexual relationship before the attorney client relationship was established. It's a balance of power concern.
There's a good discussion on this page here:
https://casetext.com/rule/illinois-court-rules/illinois-supreme-court-ru...
I do also find it quite interesting that one of the disbarred persons was convicted of a battery of a sexual nature, as was the person censured. It seems a little, to use an archaic legal term, "pretty hinky". I know the facts are not the same, but to mete out a censure to one whilst disbarring the other raises some red flags.