Practice News
-
November 9, 2010 |
Practice News
In a must-read article in the November Illinois Bar Journal, Mary Cascino explains the recent amendments to the Illinois POA Act and discusses the new statutory POA forms that take effect later next year. But did you know there's POA for pet care? Well, there is, and Peter Canalia describes it in the latest ISBA Animal Law newsletter. "In the event that your pet should require boarding, veterinarian care or hospitalization while you are away, the Durable Power of Attorney for Pet Care assures service providers that the person/caretaker ('agent') named in your Durable Power of Attorney for Pet Care has the legal authority to authorize services provided to your pet and to contract on your behalf for payment of those services," he writes. Read the article.
-
November 4, 2010 |
Practice News
The Illinois Supreme Court announced Wednesday that DuPage County State's Attorney Joseph E. Birkett has been appointed to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second Judicial District. He takes the position presently held by the Honorable John M. O'Malley, who is retiring from judicial office on December 5, 2010. This appointment is effective Dec. 13, 2010 through December 3. 2012.
-
November 4, 2010 |
Practice News
You'd like to serve occasionally as a GAL, child representative, or attorney for the child, but you're hardly an expert in child psychology. How do you play this important but challenging role? Seasoned lawyers offer dos, don'ts, and tips in the November Illinois Bar Journal.
-
November 4, 2010 |
Practice News
Asked and Answered By John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC Q. I am the managing partner of a 90 attorney firm in Chicago. We have 45 equity partners, 20 non-equity partners, and 25 associates. We have a three member executive committee as well as other committees in place in addition to the managing partner. Five years ago we formulated a strategic plan and have been attempting to successfully implement it since that time. We have had limited success. We don't seem to be able to get our partners "on board" with the actual implementation. I will tell you - I am truly herding cats here. Any ideas on how to get these guys and gals on board? A. Getting your partners on board is always a challenge. The obstacles are almost too numerous to outline. Yet if law firms want to be successful in this turbulent environment they must embrace change and get their partners not only behind new strategies but often they must also be the ones to implement these strategies as well. Managing lawyers in general is like herding cats. But trying to manage "star partners" is a real challenge. They are the "hitters" upon which a firm's future often depends. True star partners are:
- Building enduring client relationships
- Consistently performing up to their full potential
- Putting the firm first and implementing strategic imperatives
-
November 2, 2010 |
Practice News
Note: These are the results from 2010. Click here for March 2012 results.
All of Illinois' Supreme Court Justices won their retention races on Tuesday - but three Supreme Court Justices were dismissed in Iowa. Results from retentions and contested elections (winners in bold). Cook County Circuit (McCarthy vacancy)
- Maureen Masterson Pulia (R)
- Daniel J. Gallagher (D)
Retention Candidates - YES OR NO Supreme Court 1st Judicial District
- Charles E. Freeman - YES
- Thomas R. Fitzgerald - YES
Appellate Court 1st Judicial District
- Joseph Gordon - YES
- Shelvin Louise Marie Hall - YES
-
November 2, 2010 |
Practice News
All of Illinois' Supreme Court Justices won their retention races on Tuesday - but three Supreme Court Justices were dismissed in Iowa. Results from retentions and contested elections (winners in bold, Yes or No on retentions). 1st Judicial Circuit Retention
- W. Charles Grace - YES
- William G. Schwartz - YES
2nd District Supreme Retention
- Bob Thomas - YES
2nd District Appellate Retention
- John J. Bowman - YES
2nd Judicial Circuit Retention
- Larry D. Dunn - YES
- David K. Frankland - YES
- Terry H. Gamber - YES
- Robert M. Hopkins - YES
- Paul W. Lamar - YES
3rd District Supreme Retention
- Tom Kilbride - YES
3rd District Appellate Retention
- Mary W. McDade - YES
3rd Judicial Circuit Retention
- A. Andreas "Andy" Matoesian
4th Judicial Circuit Retention
- Michael P. Kiley - YES
- Kelly D. Long - YES
- Wm. Robin Todd - YES
4th Judicial Circuit Coady Vacancy
- Michelle Coady (D)
- Douglas L. Jarman (R)
Hitpas Vacancy
- Doug Gruenke (R)
- Dennis Middendorff (D)
Sauer Vacancy
- Mark W. Stedelin (R)
- Eddie Veltman (D)
5th District Appellate Retention
- Thomas M. Welch - YES
5th Judicial Circuit Retention
- Claudia Anderson - YES
- Michael D. Clary - YES
- Millard S. Everhart - YES
- James R. Glenn - YES
- Gary W. Jacobs - YES
- Teresa K. Righter - YES
-
November 1, 2010 |
Practice News
Justice Rita B. Garman of the Supreme Court of Illinois has begun an application process for a Circuit Court vacancy in the Sixth Judicial Circuit. The at-large vacancy is created by the retirement of Circuit Judge Theodore E. Paine effective November 3, 2010. Under the Illinois Constitution, judicial vacancies are filled by Supreme Court appointment. The application process will lead to final Court approval. The applicants will undergo an evaluation and screening process.
-
October 27, 2010 |
Practice News
Illinois State Bar Association Assembly member Andrea M. Schleifer has been appointed as a Circuit Judge of Cook County, Twelfth Subcircuit. This appointment fills the vacancy created by the retirement of the Honorable Mary K. Rochford. It is effective Nov. 16, 2010, and terminates on Dec.3, 2012.
-
October 27, 2010 |
Practice News
Asked and Answered By John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC Q. I am an owner of a 5 attorney law firm in the upper midwest. There are 4 associates in the firm and I hope to eventually make them partners. I have two children that will be finishing law school in the next year or two and they have expressed an interest in joining the firm. Is this a good idea? I have heard horror stories about such arrangements? What are your thoughts? A. I have seen it go both ways. Many firms have brought children and other family members into the firm and have had excellent results. Others have not. In general I believe that law firms do a better job at this than do other business firms. Your situation is more complicated since you have associates in place that may feel threatened and uncertain as to their futures when you bring in family members. I believe that if you lay the proper foundation and go about it correctly you can successfully bring your children into the firm. Here are a few ideas:
- Recognize that for the family members there will be a family system, the family law firm, and an overlapping of these systems. This can be fertile ground for conflict if clear boundaries between the family role and the firm (business) role are not clear. Establish clear boundaries. Family dynamics and business dynamics seldom mix. Your objective should be to draw the clearest possible distinction between the two and make sure that everyone understands that the firm (business) is the firm and the family is the family.
- Children should not be brought into the firm unless they want to be involved and satisfy your standard hiring criteria for lawyers.
-
October 27, 2010 |
Practice News
The legal-writing experts frown on over-quoting, particularly from court opinions. Your readers tend to hurdle a big block quotation; they don't read it at all. You will be more effective if you paraphrase the quoted material or just use the best part of it. This also gives you an opportunity to make your point as persuasively as possible. Even if you use a block quotation, paraphrasing what it says as to introduce it has a better chance of getting read than the quotation itself. Or, to think of it in another way, you introduce your quoted material with a paraphrase just as a moderator introduces a speaker. (Kenneth F. Oettle, "Give a Quotation a Good Introduction," the Scribes Journal of Legal Writing, Vol. 11, p. 137 (2007)). Don’t believe me? Check Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341(a), which states in part that “lengthy quotations are not favored and should be included only where they will aid the court’s comprehension of the argument.”