The Illinois Supreme Court announced today an expansion of its judge mentoring program designed to aid judges in the performance of their judicial duties.
The new Peer Judge Mentor Program is the continuation of an initiative announced 13 months ago by Illinois Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald and the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts under Director Cynthia Y. Cobbs to improve public confidence in the courts and ensure judicial independence by improving the skills and performance of the Illinois judiciary.
"Judicial independence is necessarily dependent upon public confidence in the operation of our courts," said Chief Justice Fitzgerald. "The Peer Mentoring Program, along with prior judicial performance initiatives announced by the Court, are prompted by a desire to produce the highest quality judiciary for the citizens of this state. They are designed to make a very good judiciary even better."
The new initiative will train and assign judicial mentors to Illinois judges who seek to enhance their skills or performance. A judge's self-referral might be prompted by participation in the Court's Judicial Performance Evaluation Program, which was made mandatory for Illinois judges in the Supreme Court's 2008 initiatives. In addition to providing for self-referral, the new initiative also vests in a chief circuit court judge discretion to assign a mentor to a judge who could benefit from a confidential one-on-one relationship.
Training of a corps of judicial mentors and administration of the mentoring program will be modeled after the successes of the New Judge Mentoring Program which the Court and the Administrative Office have conducted since 1998. That program was first initiated by then Chief Justice Charles E. Freeman and is considered a crucial tool in the training and development of new judges.
Practice News
-
January 19, 2010 |
Practice News
-
January 18, 2010 |
Practice News
When did the words "skills" and "talents" become inadequate? I keep hearing announcers and pundits in sports and politics referring to a person's "skill-sets." Is it too late to add this to Lake Superior State University's 2010 Banished Word List? Just wondering.
-
January 18, 2010 |
Practice News
I was reading Paul Krugman's column in today's New York Times in which he used the abbreviation "O.K." That got me thinking--should it be "O.K." or "OK." (We'll discuss whether I have a life later.) That led to my next question--what does Bryan think? Garner's Modern American Usage finds either okay but OK is used more in informal conversations. The Associated Press Stylebook finds OK okay as well but frowns on okay. Garner does say that the New Yorker likes O.K., so it must be a New York thing. I didn't realize until I opened Garner that OK is "the most successful Americanism ever--perhaps the best-known word on the planet." (Page 588) I'll treat OK with more respect in the future.
-
January 18, 2010 |
Practice News
Last week the Legal Writing Prof Blog recited a list of books that had been recommended for attorneys who wanted to improve their work product (writing) that had been compiled by an informal survey at the law librarian listserv. It’s a good list but didn’t include the following books that I also thought were good. I don’t think either list is exclusive of the other. Anyway, my additions to that list: Writing with Style (2nd ed. 2000), by John R. Trimble. This book was mentioned or recommended by Bryan A. Garner at one of his seminars, and I bought it on his recommendation alone. It is the best book on writing that I have ever read. I try to re-read it every year. Plain English for Lawyers (2nd ed. 2005), by Richard C. Wydick. A classic. Writing to Win (1999), by Steven D. Stark. Written by a former litigator for lawyers, it also gives specific tips on briefs, complaints, and memos. Revising Business Prose (2nd ed. 1987), by Richard A. Lanham. Provides you a template “how to” improve your writing. Writing for the Legal Audience (2003), by Wayne Schiess. Schiess is a legal-writing professor at the University of Texas. His book is excellent, and I follow his blog as well. Maybe the next list should recommend books on writing that are not directed at lawyers.
-
January 15, 2010 |
Practice News
My current issue of the Atlantic came in the mail last week. It included an article by Michael Kinsley in which he argued that newspaper articles are too long. As a consequence of their length and style, Kinsley believes that newspapers are losing readers to the Internet, which he believes get right to the point. (“Cut This Story!”) He closed by quoting the admonition he received from the chief copy editor on Kinsley’s first day at the Royal Oak Daily Tribune. “Remember, every word you cut saves the publisher money.” A good thing to remember in legal writing as well, don’t you think?
-
January 15, 2010 |
Practice News
CARPLS Legal Aid is looking for volunteer attorneys to counsel clients on Cook County's legal aid telephone hotline. You must preregister for this training via email to lwallin@carpls.org. Walk-ins will not be accepted. CARPLS is an innovative legal aid service that offers an immediate response to the every-day legal problems confronting low-income families in Cook County. CARPLS' legal aid hotline and court-based advice desks give low-income clients direct access to experienced attorneys who are trained to quickly assess and respond to a wide range of civil legal problems. CARPLS attorneys resolve over 85% of all cases in-house by providing information, advice and brief services including the preparation and review of legal documents. Clients with more complex needs are referred by CARPLS to a network of specialized legal and social service providers. CARPLS' unique "legal triage" system serves as a model for legal aid communities across the country and has increased access to justice by dramatically reducing the cost of legal aid services to the poor. Our volunteers give advice in the limited practice areas of family, consumer debt and landlord/tenant matters. Volunteers provide legal advice, draft and distribute self-help materials, and make referrals to legal service providers for representation. CARPLS volunteers, once trained, can participate in our Nightline program (evening volunteering Wednesday evenings from 6:00 - 8:00); or CARPLS Works (daytime volunteering Monday through Friday from 9:00 - 1:00 or 1:00 - 5:00). All volunteers go through a common training program and are qualified to work in any program. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED: If you would like to answer the call to help Cook County's low income residents, please send an e-mail and resume to lwallin@carpls.org, or call Leslie Wallin at (312) 421-4427.
-
January 14, 2010 |
Practice News
It's common practice to accommodate Medicare liens in personal injury liability claims. But must litigants also protect Medicare from future medical expenses -- i.e., those that might be incurred by the plaintiff after settlement or judgment? Heyl Royster's Brad Peterson brings us up to date in the January Illinois Bar Journal.
-
January 14, 2010 |
Practice News
Senate Bill 2514 (Silverstein, D-Chicago) requires an attorney who withdraws from representing a representative to file a petition for fees and costs within 30 days after the withdrawal is approved by the court. Senate Bill 2514 was introduced Jan. 12. Senate Bill 2514 may be found at this link
-
January 13, 2010 |
Practice News
Legal ethicists and practice-management advisors have long preached the value of engagement letters, where you spell out for clients the scope of your representation, how you'll determine fees, and the like. Engagement letters avoid confusion and -- let's be honest -- provide valuable CYA. But if they were important before, they're even more important now that the new Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct have taken effect. For example, the new rules require that expenses, not just fees, be "reasonable." And there are new requirements that information about fees be reduced to writing. In an article in the latest ISBA Trusts and Estates newsletter, Darrell E. Dies describes the relevant rule changes and persuasively makes the case that the day of handshake agreements with clients are over. Or certainly should be. Lots of good info and advice here from Darrell, whatever your practice setting.
-
January 13, 2010 |
Practice News
Asked and Answered By John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC Q. At a recent partner meeting we discussed the current economy and what changes we need to be thinking about both now and when we come out of the recession. What are your thoughts? A. As law firms emerge from the current recession many will face many new business realities and be forced to consider whether existing business models are still appropriate for the future. Legal process outsourcing (LPO), off-shoring, virtual offices, alternative billing, etc. We believe that the recession may accelerate the pace by which firms reevaluate existing processes and consider new business models. Ten years ago (1999) the ABA hosted the "Seize the Future" conference in Phoenix, Arizona. Click here for my coverage of the event. The conference predicted massive change fueled by the Internet. Many of these changes we have already witnessed and experienced - others are yet to come - possibly in the near future. Richard Susskind's popular book The End of Lawyers: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services paints an interesting future. As we emerge from the recession pressures will exist that may accelerate some of the other changes that have been predicted. Here are some changes that some firms are already implementing:
- Outsourcing back-office support functions such as accounts receivable management and collections, leased employees (PEO), billing and accounting, IT support, payroll, facilities management, copying and duplicating, etc.
- Outsourcing legal services to contract attorneys and paralegals and on-shore and off-shore legal process outsourcing (LPO) providers
- Unbundled legal services by clients with segments of work assigned to in-house counsel, outside counsel, and on-shore and off-shore legal process vendors
- Partnering by U.S. law firms with on-shore and off-shore legal process vendors
- Internet service delivery models
- Flat fee billing arrangements by large law firms with large major corporate clients
- Success fees and risk sharing with clients
- Virtual employees