Key
HQ - Highly Qualified
Q - Qualified
NQ - Not Qualified
Winners in bold
Judicial candidates are rated by the Illinois State Bar Association based on detailed information supplied by candidates, a background check by trained lawyers/investigators, and interviews of each candidate. Ratings reflect the Illinois State Bar Association’s opinion of whether candidates have the necessary qualifications for judicial service and are not a reflection of the candidates’ abilities as lawyers.
Candidates who do not participate in the process are found “not qualified”.
Supreme Court – 1st District – Fitzgerald
Mary Jane Theis
HQ
Aurelia Pucinski
NQ
Joy V. Cunningham
Q
Thomas W. Flannigan
NQ
James G. Riley (R)
Q
ISBA members, sign up to receive The Bar News' biweekly e-newsletter by emailing emailpreferences@isba.org
-
March 20, 2012 |
Practice News
-
March 20, 2012 |
Practice News
The Illinois Supreme Court disbarred eight lawyers, suspended 14, censured one and reprimanded three in its latest disciplinary filing. Sanctions were imposed because the lawyers engaged in professional misconduct by violating state ethics rules.1 comment (Most recent March 21, 2012)
-
March 20, 2012 |
Practice News
Key HQ - Highly Qualified Q - Qualified NQ - Not Qualified Winners in bold Click here for the results from Tuesday's Supreme and Appellate primaries Click here for the results from Tuesday's Downstate primaries Judicial candidates are rated by the Illinois State Bar Association based on detailed information supplied by candidates, a background check by trained lawyers/investigators, and interviews of each candidate. Ratings reflect the Illinois State Bar Association’s opinion of whether candidates have the necessary qualifications for judicial service and are not a reflection of the candidates’ abilities as lawyers. Candidates who do not participate in the process are found “not qualified”.6 comments (Most recent March 22, 2012)
-
March 19, 2012 |
Practice News | ISBA News
"Scams and Cons" and "Psychology of the Scams" will air on Chicago Access Network Television, Channel 21 in Chicago, at 10 p.m. Scams and Cons will air on Tuesdays, March 27 and April 10, and Psychology of the Scams will air on Tuesdays, April 3 and 17. These half-hour programs are presented by Illinois Law, a cable production of the Illinois State Bar Association. Illinois Law programs are available for online viewing at iln.isba.org/blog/illinois-law-video.Appearing on the shows are Eric Salcedo, Office of the Illinois Attorney General; Katie Walsh, director, Senior Citizen Services, Cook County Sheriff’s Office; program moderator Gilda Hudson-Winfield, Law Offices of Gilda Hudson-Winfield, in Chicago; and Detective Sergeant James Hennelly, Financial Crimes/Public Corruption, Cook County Sheriff’s Police Department, in Maywood.The 33,000-member organization, with offices in Springfield and Chicago, provides professional services to Illinois lawyers, and education and services to the public.
-
March 15, 2012 |
Practice News
ISBA Director of Legislative Affairs Jim Covington reviews bills in Springfield of interest to ISBA members. This week he covers Senate Bill 3792 (Mechanics Lien Act), Senate Bill 3773 (FOIA), House Bill 5823 (Heath Care Services Lien Act), Senate Bill 3810 (Uniform Assignment of Rents Act) and Senate Bill 2894 (Probate fees). More information on each bill is available below the video.
-
March 15, 2012 |
Practice News
Chief Justice Thomas L. Kilbride of the Illinois Supreme Court and Chief Judge Ann Callis of the Third Judicial Circuit announced Thursday that news cameras will be allowed in the criminal trial courts in Madison County under a pilot program approved by the Supreme Court earlier this year.The Third Circuit follows the 14th Judicial Circuit in the Quad Cities area where extended media coverage has already been implemented under the experimental program, as well as the 21st Circuit which received approval last week for allowing news cameras at criminal trials in Kankakee County.“I congratulate Chief Judge Callis for moving her circuit forward in this experimental program,” said Chief Justice Kilbirde. “Madison County and the surrounding area is known for a vibrant and energetic brand of media. Because of its proximity to St. Louis, it will provide the pilot program with input from metropolitan TV and radio stations, who are already accustomed to camera coverage in Missouri courts.“The pilot program is proceeding in the 14th Circuit where still or video cameras have already recorded actual court proceedings in Rock Island, Henry and Whiteside counties. In the 21st Circuit, Chief Judge Kathy Bradshaw Elliott has met with media in the Kankakee and Chicago area and expects to implement camera coverage shortly. As the pilot project goes forward in another geographical area of the state, the most important issue is to continue to balance carefully the goals of greater openness and access with dig-nity for the process and the guaranteed rights of defendants to a fair trial.”
-
March 15, 2012 |
Practice News
By Joseph R. Marconi[1]The Rules of Professional Conduct now requires attorneys to provide consent for the banks holding client funds to automatically report overdraws to the ARDC. This is an early detection system for possible financial malfeasance and a call for more discipline in managing and accounting for client funds. Illinois Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15 requires attorneys to hold client property in an interest-bearing trust account separate from the attorney’s own property. These accounts include Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTAs) and non-IOLTA trust accounts. In an article from last year, In “Eligible” IOLTAs We Trust, we noted some of the September 2011 changes to this rule. One of the more significant changes to Rule 1.15 is the automatic overdraft notification provision, Rule 1.15(h). The rule requires the financial institution at which the trust account is established to promptly notify the ARDC if a trust account is overdrawn, regardless of whether or not the instrument is honored.To implement the reporting requirement, the rule mandates that all attorneys admitted to practice in Illinois “shall, as a condition thereof, be conclusively deemed to have consented to the reporting and production requirements mandated by this Rule.” Likewise, to be eligible to offer client trust accounts, financial institutions must agree to comply with the reporting requirement.
-
March 15, 2012 |
Practice News
Asked and AnsweredBy John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMCQ. Our firm, a 17 attorney firm in St. Louis, Missouri, is having a major problem with client defections. We practice in the area of insurance defense exclusively. We have lost several insurance company clients and for those that we are working with - our case assignments are dwindling. Do you have any thoughts or suggestions?
-
March 15, 2012
It's a lawyer's nightmare that has been cussed and discussed for centuries (see, e.g., David Mellinkoff's classic The Conscience of a Lawyer). When can you withdraw if your client lies on the stand or says he will? Can you reveal your client's perjury? Must you? In the latest ISBA Traffic Laws and Courts newsletter, criminal defense attorney Juliet Boyd explores various frightening but fascinating scenarios in light of the ethics rules and some recent cases.Not a member of The Traffic Laws and Courts Section? Join here.
-
March 12, 2012 |
ISBA News | Practice News
ISBA’s Board of Governors has adopted a resolution reaffirming its opposition to fee splitting with non-lawyers and the ownership of law firms by non-lawyers. Both issues are under active consideration by the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 and could come before the ABA House of Delegates this August. ISBA leaders intend to introduce its resolution, along with support from other bars, at the same time.President-elect John E. Thies presented the resolution at the March 9 meeting of the ISBA Board in Quincy. He noted that the proposed changes in the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct run counter not only to ISBA policy but also to ABA policy established in 2000 that stated: “The law governing lawyers that prohibits lawyers from sharing legal fees with non-lawyers and from directly or indirectly transferring to non-lawyers ownership or control over entities practicing law should not be revised.”Earlier in 2000, ISBA’s Assembly adopted a report urging the ABA House to reject proposed changes to permit sharing of fees with non-lawyers and ownership of law firms by non-lawyers. That policy remains in effect.2 comments (Most recent March 13, 2012)