The many standards of appellate review, and how these standards have evolved over time, may be creating confusion as to how to review factual determinations made by lower courts in relocation cases, writes Daniel Alcorn in his article, “Relocation, Relocation, Relocation,” in the October 2019 Illinois Bar Journal. Alcorn goes on to explore why it appears “to be so difficult … for the appellate court to faithfully adhere to what appears to be a fairly straightforward standard of review”? One reason: “There are many standards of appellate review, and their evolution over time independently of one another has caused a ‘state of confusion,’ as observed by one commentator.”

Read more in the October Illinois Bar Journal.