Pension reliefBy Douglas A. DarchEmployee Benefits, February 2014Illinois state pension law is a complex web of built-in extra benefits that costs taxpayers billions. In Hooker v. Retirement Board, the Supreme Court limited eligibility for one of those extra benefits.
SB1 Pension ReformBy Lori Cowdrey Benso & John LowderEmployee Benefits, February 2014A closer look at the changes.
A summary of the anti-cutback ruleBy Patrick M. ColganEmployee Benefits, February 2014A brief overview of some of the components that have been included in a court’s analysis of the anti-cutback rule including examples of that analysis.
Federal caselaw updateEmployee Benefits, September 2013Recent federal cases of interets to employee benefits practitioners.
Federal successor liability under ERISA and the MPPAABy Donald S. Rothschild & Brian M. DoughertyLabor and Employment Law, July 2013This article will explore the history of ERISA and the MPPAA, how successor liability has evolved under federal law and what needs to be proven in order to hold a successor company liable for withdrawal liability.
Is an Illinois resident’s inherited IRA protected from bankruptcy creditors?By David F. Rolewick & Justin J. KarubasTrusts and Estates, July 2013There is a split in the circuits regarding whether or not inherited IRAs are protected from bankruptcy creditors. The Fifth Circuit has held that a Texas resident’s inherited IRA is protected from bankruptcy creditors. The Seventh Circuit has held that a Wisconsin resident’s inherited IRA is not protected from bankruptcy creditors. Both Wisconsin and Texas have not opted out of the bankruptcy exemptions. Therefore, federal bankruptcy exemptions apply.
A recent PSEBA decision: Lifetime benefits they are not!By Carlos S. ArévaloLabor and Employment Law, March 2013The Fifth District Appellate Court recently held in Pyle v. City of Granite Citythat a firefighter was not entitled to the so-called “lifetime” health insurance benefits from his employer, the City of Granite City.
Employee benefit plans—The importance of classifying individualsBy Bernard G. PeterCorporate Law Departments, October 2012Sometimes employers categorize special or contingent workers as independent contractors when they may not meet the criteria to be an independent contractor.
Employer 401(k) plan and health care plan disclosures to be made in second half of 2012By Bernard G. PeterCorporate Law Departments, August 2012Over the next three months virtually all employers will be required to provide their employees a substantial amount of information regarding the employee benefits plan they sponsor. This article summarizes these new employer obligations.
Federal caselaw updateBy Michael BartolicEmployee Benefits, May 2012Recent cases of interest to employee benefits practitioners.
Roth 401(k) plansBy Leonard S. DeFrancoFederal Taxation, April 2012An overview of Roth accounts for retirement planning.
Federal caselaw updateEmployee Benefits, March 2012Recent cases of interest to employee benefits practitioners.
For §513 contributions, why not use your IRA—penalty free?By Edward J. BurtFamily Law, March 2012The practitioner may consider crafting a settlement agreement that utilizes IRA accounts as a source for funding the college education expenses, and thus, the client has somewhat resolved the college funding issue and removes some of the uncertainty as to his/her future obligation for college expenses.
Military leave laws’ impact on defined contribution and defined benefit plansBy Patrick M. ColganEmployee Benefits, March 2012USERRA (Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployments Rights Act and the HEART Act (Hero Earnings Assistance Relief Tax Act) created some additional protections on service members’ employee benefits. The employee benefit protections, specifically those impacting defined benefit and defined contribution plans, are the focus of this article.
New W-2 reporting requirements: What employers need to knowBy Derek A. SchryerEmployee Benefits, November 2011All employers that provide applicable employer-sponsored coverage during a calendar year are subject to the reporting requirement set forth in Code Section 6051(a)(14).
CIGNA Corp. v. Amara case updateBy Richard TothEmployee Benefits, September 2011The case signals a likely expansion of the remedies under ERISA’s § 502(a)(3), which provides for “appropriate equitable relief.”