Postmortem QDROs-May benefits be divided after death?By William L. Scogland & Mark A. BerggenEmployee Benefits, June 2004Issues regarding the qualification of postmortem domestic relations orders ("DROs") continue to exist as a unified approach among the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals has yet to be made clear to benefit law practitioners.
QDRO processing costs can be allocated to individual accountsBy Michael Todd ScottEmployee Benefits, June 2004On May 19, 2003, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin 2003-3 to address the allocation of certain defined contribution plan expenses among participant accounts.
Noisy withdrawal and its implications for the employee benefits lawyerBy Julie A. GovreauEmployee Benefits, May 2004In response to the scandals that shook the foundations of the corporate world and severely compromised public confidence in the private sector, Congress in 2002 passed The American Competitiveness and Corporate Accountability Act of 2002, better known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Retirement plans, insurance and taxesBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, May 2004Publisher's note: In response to "The 70-80 percent tax trap: How to help clients avoid the double taxation of money in their qualified plan or IRA," which appeared in the last issue of The Counselor, a reader noted that the IRS has since issued guidance to shut down what it considers "abusive transactions" involving specially designed life insurance polices in retirement plans (so-called "section 412(i) plans").
Summary of recent federal casesBy Teresa Faherty BlomquistEmployee Benefits, May 20041. ADEA gives age discrimination reprieve. Follow-up to Erie County Retirees Association v. Erie County, 3d Cir., No. 99-3877, 8/1/00.
International stock ownership as a benefits strategyBy Randy L. Gegelman & Amy SeidelCorporate Law Departments, February 2004A significant number of multinational corporations have implemented broad-based stock ownership arrangements extending to their foreign employees.
The mutual fund scandals and your retirement plansBy Ned OthmanCorporate Law Departments, January 2004Daily news reports headline that federal and state law enforcement officials, including New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, are investigating trading practices at a number of the nation's leading mutual fund companies.
Allocation of expenses in a defined contribution plan: Pro rata vs. per capitaBy John CallasEmployee Benefits, October 2003The Department of Labor recently released its third Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB). A FAB is intended to provide guidance to DOL investigators who conduct compliance audits as well as to practitioners who have day-to-day responsibility for compliance with federal laws and regulations.
Debit/credit cards and health plan expense reimbursementBy Linda ShashinkaEmployee Benefits, October 2003Employers are continuously striving to provide their employees with efficient, understandable, cost-effective health care benefits.
A new concept in retirement plans, the Solo (K)By Dr. Bart A. BasiYoung Lawyers Division, October 2003According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are currently 17 million self-employed individuals in the United States.
New rules for 204(h) noticesBy William L. Scogland & Teresa Faherty BlomquistEmployee Benefits, October 2003The Internal Revenue Service's final regulations for 204(h) notices, as such notices were amended by EGTRRA, are examples of subtle changes made to an ERISA rule in reaction to a much more controversial phenomenon, viz., the conversion of traditional defined benefit plans to cash balance plans.
Employment in Ireland: Compensation and benefits issuesBy David R. ShannonEmployee Benefits, July 2003This is a general survey of compensation and benefit issues that a multinational employer with a presence in Ireland may encounter.
Reinsuring employee benefit plan risks through a captiveBy Michael Lusk & Michael Todd ScottCorporate Law Departments, June 2003Since the Department of Labor approved a prohibited transaction exemption for Columbia Energy Corporation in 2000, there has been an increased interest from employers in reinsuring employee benefit plan risks through their captives
Case summariesBy Kyle MurrayEmployee Benefits, April 2003Hackett suffered from a personality disorder, making it difficult for him to interact with co-workers.
Federal case updatesBy Milan KimEmployee Benefits, April 2003Jebian was a participant in Hewlett's ERISA plan, which was run by Voluntary Plan Administrator (VPA), an independent claims administrator.
Chicago Bar Association, YLS Estate Planning Committee seminarBy Vigmalia Medero PerezEmployee Benefits, January 2003On October 2, 2002, the Chicago Bar Association, YLS Estate Planning Committee hosted a seminar called Individual Retirement Accounts: What You Need To Know When Creating an Estate Plan for Your Client.
ERISA preemption and beneficiaries of non-probate assets after divorceBy Edward J. MitchellElder Law, December 2002Under Illinois law, a divorced spouse is presumed to have predeceased her ex-spouse for purposes of receiving a legacy or other interest under a will. See 755 ILCS 5/4-7.
ERISA remedial powers and plan reimbursement claimsBy Michael J. MarovichCivil Practice and Procedure, December 2002Any attorney practicing in the field of personal injury law inevitably faces claimed rights to reimbursement from an injured party's health insurance company.
Federal employee benefits case law reviewBy Amy L. Pauls & Milan KimEmployee Benefits, December 2002Lessard v. Applied Risk Management; MMI Companies; Professional Risk Management, No. 01-15648 (9th Cir. filed Oct. 3, 2002). Lessard was on medical leave the day her employer completed a sale of all of its assets to another corporation.
Underfunded defined benefit plans: The end of the pension holidayBy Teresa Faherty BlomquistEmployee Benefits, December 2002A line from Hamlet describes the uneasy juxtaposition of a wedding party and a funeral: "The funeral bak'd meats / Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables."
ERISA preemption and healthcare in the post-Moran worldBy Teresa Faherty BlomquistEmployee Benefits, October 2002A series of judgment calls in Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran 536 U.S. ____ (2002) led the Supreme Court to an ultimate decision last June that diminishes ERISA's preemption of state laws and weakens the ability of HMOs in Illinois to manage their costs.
Federal employee benefits case law reviewBy Amy L. PaulsEmployee Benefits, October 2002A former participant in a collectively bargained pension fund was properly denied benefits for engaging in prohibited self-employment after retirement.
Have you thought about…By Margaret M. BensonEmployee Benefits, October 2002In 1974, Congress gave birth to ERISA. For 28 years, attorneys, legislators, accountants, judges and consultants have had a hand in raising her, variously protecting, shepherding and influencing her.