Section Newsletters

Articles on Employee Benefits

What your colleagues are reading Employee Benefits, October 2002 A request to members for favorite Employee Benefits resources resulted in the following:
Case law update and review By Amy L. Pauls Employee Benefits, May 2002 In this case, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that the district court for the Northern District of Illinois had incorrectly held that a funeral home owner had expressly agreed to be bound by a multi-employer plan.
Case law update and review By Stepfon R. Smith Employee Benefits, May 2002 In this accountant malpractice action, the plaintiffs, to their detriment, relied upon professional tax accounting advice for retirement planning purposes from defendant Deloitte & Touche.
Example section 404(c) Notice to participants and beneficiaries regarding self-directed investment accounts Employee Benefits, May 2002 Under this Plan, you may exercise control over the assets held in your account under the Plan.
To our readers Employee Benefits, May 2002 Our fourth newsletter of the 2001-2002 year includes two interesting updates regarding recent case law that pertains to employee benefit plans and retirement programs.
Controlled group liability for withdrawal liability from multi-employer pension plan ends at U.S. borders By Brian K. Wydajewski Employee Benefits, January 2002 On March 6, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request for review and let stand a decision of the U.S.
State legislative update By Lori C. Skinner Employee Benefits, January 2002 Senate Bill 866--Amends the Illinois Insurance Code and the Health Maintenance Organization Act to provide that coverage under those Acts for mastectomies must include reconstruction of the subject breast, as well as the other breast, to achieve a symmetrical appearance.
To our readers Employee Benefits, January 2002 Our third newsletter of the 2001-2002 year includes an interesting article regarding a recent decision of the U.S.
Employee Benefits Section Council review of recent cases and IRS matters By Kevin J. Richter Employee Benefits, December 2001 In Gilliam v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 7th Cir. No. 99-3942 (11/29/00) the Seventh Circuit found that the Defendant, United Parcel Service, did not violate the Family and Medical Leave Act by firing a worker.
To our readers Employee Benefits, December 2001 Our second newsletter of the 2001-2002 year includes an interesting update regarding recent case law and a review of several Announcements, Notices, Revenue Procedures, and Revenue Rulings from the Internal Revenue Service that pertain to employee benefit plans and retirement programs.
Economic Growth and Tax Recovery Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 By Lawrence R. Krupp Employee Benefits, October 2001
Letter to the ISBA Employee Benefits Section By Kathryn J. Kennedy Employee Benefits, October 2001 One of the goals of last year's Chair of the Employee Benefits Section Council, Brian Wydajewski, was to initiate a mentoring program between our state's seasoned employee benefits practitioners and our newest recruits to the ranks of employee benefits law.
To our readers Employee Benefits, October 2001 Our first newsletter of the 2001-2002 includes an outline regarding the subject of certain provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Recovery Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 that pertain to employee benefit plans and retirement programs.
IRS eases rules for minimum required distributions By Steven Lifson Employee Benefits, May 2001 The IRS has issued new regulations that govern required minimum yearly distributions from Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRAs") and tax-qualified plans to people over age 70-1/2 and to beneficiaries of deceased IRA owners and plan participants
To our readers Employee Benefits, May 2001 Our third newsletter of the 2000-2001 term addresses the subject of the new rules pertaining to the requirement for minimum retirement distributions from Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRAs") and tax-qualified retirement plans for employees over the age of 70-1/2 and to beneficiaries of deceased IRA owners and plan participants.
Appeals court holds that ADEA applies to retiree health plan By Sharon R. Cohen Corporate Law Departments, February 2001 In Erie County Retirees Assoc. v. County of Erie, Pennsylvania, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act applies to retirees and retiree health plans.
Calling all government attorneys By Lynn Patton Employee Benefits, December 2000 The ISBA's Standing Committee on Government Lawyers wants to include you in its constituency. Historically, neither the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission nor the Illinois State Bar Association has maintained data with respect to those attorneys engaged in government practice.
Illinois State Bar Association Employee Benefits Section Council Employee Benefits, December 2000 The Employee Benefits Section Council of the Illinois State Bar Association (the "section council") is comprised of attorneys whose legal practice is concerned with all aspects of employee benefits and compensation arrangements.
Legal case review By Kevin J. Richter Employee Benefits, December 2000 On August 18, 2000, the IRS issued announcement 2000-77 which provides criteria for determination letter applications for Volume Submitter plans that have not received GUST II advisory letters.
To our readers Employee Benefits, December 2000 The theme of the second newsletter of the 2000-2001 term addresses the subject of the Employee Benefits Section Council, our purpose, and our resources that are available to members of the section and members of the Illinois State Bar Association.
Domestic partner health benefits: legal and administrative issues to consider and the implementation process Employee Benefits, November 2000 Employee benefits for domestic partners ("domestic partner benefits") is an area of employee benefits which continues to gain momentum in employer offerings.
A sad note from our chairman regarding the death of Joan Edmonds Brophy Employee Benefits, November 2000 It is with great sadness that I report the passing of our dear colleague and friend, Joan Edmonds Brophy, on August 26, 2000.
To our readers Employee Benefits, November 2000 The theme of the first newsletter of the 2000-2001 term addresses the subject of employee benefits for domestic partners ("domestic partners").
Survey on QILDRO By Steven N. Peskind Family Law, October 2000 On July 1, 1999, after ten years of work by the Illinois State Bar Association Family Law Section Council, HB1612 became law creating a vehicle to assign retirement benefits from State of Illinois pension plans.
Employee benefit plans for associations By Laurence A. Hansen Employee Benefits, May 2000 Defined contribution plan ("DC plan") is a retirement plan under which the benefit to be paid is determined by the contributions to the plan along with any earnings thereon.
To our readers Employee Benefits, May 2000 The theme of the final newsletter for the 1999-2000 term addresses employee benefit plans for tax-exempt associations.
Newsletter for Employee Benefits Section Ten Year Topic Index (1989-1999) Employee Benefits, April 2000 Recent developments affecting retirement plans and welfare plans of religious institutions.
Fiduciary duties of the ESOP trustee By Marilyn H. Marchetti & Danielle Montesano Employee Benefits, February 2000 The following article examines the duties of the trustee of an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP Trustee"), beginning with the governing principles of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the application of those duties to general administration and on-going administrative responsibilities of the ESOP Trustee.
Recent ESOP case law developments By Helen H. Morrison Employee Benefits, February 2000 This article is a compilation of the recent ERISA court decisions involving employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs).
To our readers Employee Benefits, February 2000 Continuing our theme of ESOPs, this follow-up newsletter focuses on the fiduciary issues applicable to ESOPs.

Select a Different Subject