Real Estate Law

Sewickley v. Chicago Title Land Trust Company

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 112977
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
QUINN
Court properly confirmed judicial sale of commercial real estate (restaurant), after default judgment in excess of $824,000 against all Defendants, and after Defendants failed to raise objections at hearing to confirm sale. Defendants had ample time to object to purchase price of $300,000, the sole and highest bid; price was never shown grossly inadequate through any admissible evidence. Inadequacy of sales price alone is insufficient basis for court to not confirm a judicial sale, and Defendants failed to present evidence as to why judicial sale should not be approved. (CUNNINGHAM and CONNORS, concurring.)

House Bill 5314

Topic: 
Security deposit and email
(Barickman, R-Pontiac; LaHood, R-Dunlap) amends the Security Deposit Return Act to allow a lessor of five or more units to send an itemized statement of damage and repair costs to the lessee by electronic mail to a verified electronic mail address provided by the lessee. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 5190

Topic: 
False UCC filings.
(Zalewski, D-Chicago; Harmon, D-Oak Park) amends the Secured Transactions Article of the Uniform Commercial Code. It provides that a person may not cause to be filed a false record the person knows or reasonably should know is (1) not authorized or permitted under specified provisions; (2) not related to a valid existing or potential commercial or financial transaction, an existing agricultural or other lien, or a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and (3) filed with the intent to harass or defraud the person identified as debtor in the record or any other person. Creates criminal and civil penalties and administrative relief from the Secretary of State. Exempts records filed by a regulated financial institution or its representative. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 3764

Topic: 
Article 9 of the UCC
(Harmon, D-Oak Park; Zalewski, D-Chicago) conforms Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code to the 2010 amendments as proposed by the Uniform Law Commission. Passed both chambers. (See the June Illinois Bar Journal article by Michelle Nijm that discusses this bill in more detail.)

House Bill 4665

Topic: 
Residential construction and radon
(McAsey, D-Lockport; Collins, D-Chicago) creates the Radon Resistant Construction Act. It requires all new residential construction include passive radon resistant construction. “New residential construction” is any original construction of a single-family home or a dwelling containing two or fewer apartments, condominiums, or townhouse. “Passive radon resistant construction” includes an installed pipe that relies solely on the convective flow of air upward for soil-gas depressurization and may consist of multiple pipes routed through conditioned space from below the foundation to above the roof. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 3792

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Althoff, R-Crystal Lake; Tyron, R-Crystal Lake) requires work to be done or materials furnished within three years for residential property and five years for any other kind of property. Senate Bill 3792 sunsets on January 1, 2016, and the limitation then reverts to three years for any kind of property at that time. Passed both chambers.

Housing Crisis Intervention: Foreclosure Mediation in Illinois

By Maria Kantzavelos
June
2012
Cover Story
, Page 296
Proponents say foreclosure mediation helps homeowners find relief – or at least closure – in an often forbidding legal process. Here’s what’s underway in the various counties.

Senate Bill 2840

Topic: 
Medicaid eligibility
(Feigenholtz, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) is supposed to eliminate Illinois’ $2.7 billion Medicaid funding gap. Included in Senate Bill 2840 is a repeal of the compromise of the Medicaid eligibility rules negotiated last fall between the Department of Healthcare and Family Services and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. Some of these changes include the following: (1) A home transferred into a trust after the bill becomes law may not be considered homestead property. If the home was transferred into a trust before the bill becomes law, it prevents a person from being eligible for long-term care if the person’s equity interest in this homestead exceeds the minimum home equity as allowed under federal law. (2) People over the age of 65 can no longer participate in a federally created OBRA Pooled Trust unless the beneficiary is a ward of the county public guardian or the State guardian. The bill has an immediate effective date and will therefore take effect when the Governor signs it. House Amendment No. 4 is at the link below, and these provisions may be found starting on page 60. Passed both chambers yesterday.