Real Estate Law

Senate Bill 2840

Topic: 
Medicaid eligibility
(Feigenholtz, D-Chicago; Steans, D-Chicago) is supposed to eliminate Illinois’ $2.7 billion Medicaid funding gap. Included in Senate Bill 2840 is a repeal of the compromise of the Medicaid eligibility rules negotiated last fall between the Department of Healthcare and Family Services and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. Some of these changes include the following: (1) A home transferred into a trust after the bill becomes law may not be considered homestead property. If the home was transferred into a trust before the bill becomes law, it prevents a person from being eligible for long-term care if the person’s equity interest in this homestead exceeds the minimum home equity as allowed under federal law. (2) People over the age of 65 can no longer participate in a federally created OBRA Pooled Trust unless the beneficiary is a ward of the county public guardian or the State guardian. (3) A healthy spouse still living at home will receive only the minimum resource allowance instead of the maximum allowance as previously approved by JCAR. ($110,000 decreased to $22,000) (4) Abolishes spousal refusal entirely so that HFS is not limited to how much it can seek when pursing a support order against a community spouse. Senate Bill 2840 will be heard in House Executive Committee this afternoon. The bill has an immediate effective date and will therefore take effect when the Governor signs it. House Amendment No. 3 is at the link below, and these provisions may be found starting on page 75.

Goldberg v. Astor Plaza Condominium Association

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominium Law
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 110620
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 23, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part with instructions.
Justice: 
R.E. GORDON
(Modified upon denial of rehearing.) Condominium unit owner sued condominium association and board of directors. Section 19 of Condominium Act is mandatory on subject of attorney's fees. Act is a fee-shifting statute which clearly states that attorney fees shall be awarded if party prevails against condominium board in enforcement action. Court should consider what fees Plaintiff incurred relating to the one count on which she prevailed, requiring association to produce minutes of its meetings for certain time periods. Board members did not breach fiduciary duty to unit owners in concluding, in reliance on legal advice, that Board did not have authority to pay for repairs sought. (GARCIA and PALMER, concurring.)

Senate Bill 3101

Topic: 
Property tax bills
(Althoff, R-Crystal Lake) allows a county collector to mail a property tax bill to the property owner at his or her new address if a property owner conveys a permanent change of address in writing to the United States Postal Service. It also allows the collector to send the tax bill via email at the request of the taxpayer. If the taxpayer makes this request, then the taxpayer must notify the collector of any change in his or her e-mail address as soon as possible after the address is changed. Passed the Senate and arrived in the House.

A Modest Proposal - Liability for Negligence in Property Inspections

By Joseph R. Fortunato Jr.
April
2012
Column
, Page 220
Is it time for legislation that voids liability limitations in property inspectors' contracts?

The Village of Palatine v. Palatin Associates

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condemnation
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (1st) 102707
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 16, 2012
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
R.E. GORDON
Village filed condemnation proceeding to acquire real estate in Palatine that was being used for shopping center, to use as police and municipal facility, and paid owner $6 million for property. Owner served five-day notices on tenants, and then filed forcible entry and detainer, and pursued actions until court dismissed them as moot. Owner's conduct does not prevent it from arguing that tenant was required to comply with leases. Nonreliance clause in leases prevents tenant from establishing justifiable reliance on any alleged prior statements by owner. Owner's alleged breach in failing to make repairs to common area did not relieve tenant of rent obligation. Tenant was not entitled to share in final award of just compensation, as five-day notices terminated leases. (LAMPKIN and PALMER, concurring.)

Irish v. BSNF Railway Co.

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
Nuisance
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 11-1211
Decision Date: 
March 21, 2012
Federal District: 
W.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed
Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' claim alleging under theories of negligence and nuisance that train trestle maintained by defendant-railroad became clogged with debris during rain storm and caused plaintiffs' properties to incur widespread flooding, where Dist. Ct. properly found that section 88.87 of Wisc. Statutes provided exclusive remedy for plaintiffs' claims, and where plaintiff had failed to follow statutory notice provisions required for proceeding on their claims. Ct. further noted that section 88.87 precluded plaintiffs' request for monetary relief and held that plaintiffs waived current argument that section 88.87 did not apply to instant lawsuit alleging only failure to maintain railroad trestle.

Senate Bill 3792

Topic: 
Mechanics Lien Act
(Althoff, R-Crystal Lake) requires that the work be done or the material furnished: (1) within 3 years from the commencement of the work or the commencement of furnishing the material in the case of work done or material furnished as to owner-occupied residential property; and (2) within 5 years from the commencement of the work or the commencement of furnishing the material in the case of work done or material furnished as to any other type of property. This new law would sunset in three years. Scheduled for hearing in Senate Judicary Committee on Tuesday afternoon.

Three Title Insurance Traps for Real Estate Lawyers

By Michael J. Rooney
March
2012
Article
, Page 146
Closing protection letters, the Form DS-1 disclosure, and key 2010 revisions to the Rules of Professional Conduct are potential pitfalls for real estate lawyers.

House Bill 4665

Topic: 
Radon
(McAsey, D-Lockport) requires that a contract to build a home must contain a provision requiring that a “radon mitigation system” be included in the construction. "Radon mitigation system" means components and measures designed to permanently reduce or eliminate indoor radon concentrations according to procedures described in 32 Illinois Administrative code Part 422. Scheduled for hearing next Wednesday in House Judiciary Committee I.

Triple R Development v. Golfview Apartments I

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Real Estate Contract
Citation
Case Number: 
2012 IL App (4th) 100956
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Champaign Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed and remanded.
Justice: 
COOK
Plaintiff development company sued buyer for defaulting on real estate purchase contract for apartment buildings, and sought payment of deposit paid by buyer. Buyer raised affirmative defense that it had not determined its eligibility for tax credits for property. Buyer failed to file counter-affidavit in response to developer's affidavit in support of motion for summary judgment. Burden of proof can shift to non-movant to offer evidence, once movant has met its initial burden of production. Developer introduced persuasive evidence that buyer's pro forma acknowledged a determination of its eligibility and that buyer had entered into negotiations for sale of tax credits. (STEIGMANN, concurring; POPE, dissenting.)