Real Estate Law

Senate Bill 56

Topic: 
Mortgage Foreclosure Article
(Collins, D-Chicago; Cassidy, D-Chicago) does three things. (1) Defines a “bona fide tenant” substantially consistent with the 2009 federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. (2) Requires a petitioner to wait 90 days (unless the lease term is longer than 90 days) before a forcible entry and detainer action may be used to terminate the possessory rights of a bona fide tenant in residential real estate. Orders of possession issued in the foreclosure proceeding will continue to be entered against the mortgagor. (3) Addresses the deficiency issue in the 2010 McGahan case as to what procedure the mortgagee must follow if a mortgagor dies. If the survivor holds a 100% interest in the property because the survivor is the deceased mortgagor’s surviving joint tenant or surviving tenant by the entirety, a special representative for the deceased mortgagor need not be appointed. Passed both chambers.

House Bill 1203

Topic: 
Counties Code and legal descriptions
(Sosnowski, R-Rockford; Althoff, R-McHenry) deletes the requirement that the required notice for a text or map amendment to include a metes and bounds legal description of the property affected as long as the notice does include the common street address or addresses and property index number (“PIN”) of all the parcels of real property contained in the affected area. Passed both chambers.

Senate Bill 56

Topic: 
Mortgage Foreclosure Article
(Collins, D-Chicago; Cassidy, D-Chicago) does three things. (1) Defines a “bona fide tenant” substantially consistent with the 2009 federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. (2) Requires a petitioner to wait 90 days (unless the lease term is longer than 90 days) before a forcible entry and detainer action may be used to terminate the possessory rights of a bona fide tenant in residential real estate. Orders of possession issued in the foreclosure proceeding will continue to be entered against the mortgagor. (3) Addresses the deficiency issue in the 2010 McGahan case as to what procedure the mortgagee must follow if a mortgagor dies. If the survivor holds a 100% interest in the property because the survivor is the deceased mortgagor’s surviving joint tenant or surviving tenant by the entirety, a special representative for the deceased mortgagor need not be appointed. Passed both chambers.

Hahn v. The County of Kane

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Easements
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (2d) 120660
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 31, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
McLAREN
Court properly found that City and auto dealership company which expanded storm water detention facility proved their affirmative defenses of estoppel. Attorney for trust, which owned land where easement for storm water detention facility was located, knew of intended use for facility yet remained silent as to owner's purported objection to use, and City and company relied on silence to their detriment. (BURKE and BIRKETT, concurring.)

Menard, Inc. v. 1945 Cornell, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 121422
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN
Court granted supplemental order of possession against tenants of foreclosured commercial property. Tenant is not required to be named as a party in initial foreclosure action, and properly recorded notice of foreclosure is constructive notice of pendency of foreclosure to persons with interest or lien. Service of supplemental petition on tenant constitutes written demand for possession. (CUNNINGHAM and DELORT, concurring.)

Forcing Lenders to Comply with the Home Affordable Modification Program

By Andrew J. Hawes
June
2013
Article
, Page 308
The seventh circuit rules that borrowers can sue lenders for state law breach of contract and other claims related to a trial period plan payment agreement.

Ripsch v. Goose Lake Association

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Declaratory Actions
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120319
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Grundy Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOLDRIDGE
A homeowners association has implied or inherent authority to regulate use of common areas, through making and enforcing reasonable rules, even where recorded covenants do not expressly grant the authority to regulate common areas. (McDADE and SCHMIDT, concurring.)

A.J. Smith Federal Savings Bank v. Sabuco

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (3d) 120578
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 10, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
LYTTON
Defendant, who received loan from Plaintiff bank secured by mortgage on a commercial office building, filed motion for release and satisfaction from deficiency judgment, after mortgage foreclosure proceeding and just prior to wage deduction hearing. Motion was an attack on the judgment underlying the wage deduction proceeding, which could be made at that hearing. As validity of underlying judgment will not be finally decided until hearing, order denying motion for accord and satisfaction is interlocutory and not appealable, and thus appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider order denying motion. WRIGHT and HOLDRIDGE, concurring.)

House Bill 2269

Topic: 
Real estate documents and thumbprints
Real estate documents and thumbprints. House Bill 2269 (Evans, D-Chicago; Napoleon Harris III) extends the sunset date for requiring a thumbprint of the transferor in a Cook County residential real estate transaction from July 1, 2013 to July 1, 2018. Passed the House and on third reading in the Senate.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Zwolinski

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Appeals
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 120612
Decision Date: 
Monday, May 6, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.,1st Div.
Holding: 
Appeal dismissed.
Justice: 
CUNNINGHAM
Defendant in mortgage foreclosure action who later filed notice of appeal failed to serve any of the parties with the notice of appeal as required by Rule 303(c). Other parties were significantly prejudiced by appellant's failure to serve notice of appeal upon them, as they were unable to file briefs on appeal or argue orally and thus were unable to protect their interests through participation in appeal. (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)